Riva TNT2 vs Radeon RX Vega 3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 3 and Riva TNT2, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX Vega 3
2019
15 Watt
2.75
+27400%

RX Vega 3 outperforms Riva TNT2 by a whopping 27400% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking8651612
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency14.27no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2019)Fahrenheit (1998−2000)
GPU code namePicassoNV5
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date20 November 2019 (6 years ago)12 October 1999 (27 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192no data
Core clock speed300 MHz125 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,940 million15 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm250 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate13.200.25
Floating-point processing power0.4224 TFLOPSno data
ROPs42
TMUs122

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPAGP 4x
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared150 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data2.4 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard Dependent1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)6.0
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.61.2
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX Vega 3 2.75
+27400%
Riva TNT2 0.01

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega 3 1149
+38200%
Samples: 3090
Riva TNT2 3
Samples: 24

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD12-0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 7−8 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 29 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 0−1
Resident Evil 4 Remake 7 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 7−8 0−1
Battlefield 5 7 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 22 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 0−1
Far Cry 5 5 0−1
Fortnite 14 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 14−16 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14 0−1
Valorant 45−50 0−1

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 7−8 0−1
Battlefield 5 9−10 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 5 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 23 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 0−1
Dota 2 21 0−1
Far Cry 5 7−8 0−1
Fortnite 14−16 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 14−16 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 9 0−1
Metro Exodus 2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6 0−1
Valorant 45−50 0−1

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 9−10 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 0−1
Dota 2 19 0−1
Far Cry 5 7−8 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 14−16 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4 0−1
Valorant 45−50 0−1

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 14−16 0−1

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 6−7 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24 0−1
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27 0−1
Valorant 24−27 0−1

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6−7 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5 0−1

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 5−6 0−1

4K
High

Atomic Heart 2−3 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 0−1
Valorant 12−14 0−1

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 8−9 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4 0−1

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.75 0.01
Recency 20 November 2019 12 October 1999
Chip lithography 12 nm 250 nm

RX Vega 3 has a 27400% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 20 years, and a 95% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX Vega 3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Riva TNT2 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 2296 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 34 votes

Rate Riva TNT2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 3 or Riva TNT2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.