GeForce GTX 480 512 vs Radeon RX Vega 24 Mobile
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) | Fermi (2010−2014) |
| GPU code name | Fenghuang | GF100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | no data | no data |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | no data | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 527 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1190 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 375 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 33.73 |
| ROPs | no data | 48 |
| TMUs | no data | 64 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 292 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 2x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 1536 MB |
| Memory bus width | no data | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2400 MHz | 2.8 GB/s |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 134.4 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a |
| HDMI | - | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | no data | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | - | N/A |
| CUDA | - | 2.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 375 Watt |
RX Vega 24 Mobile has a 186% more advanced lithography process, and 275% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 24 Mobile and GeForce GTX 480 Core 512. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 24 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
