GMA 3150 vs Radeon RX Vega 24 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1617
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Generation 4.0 (2006−2007)
GPU code nameFenghuangPineview
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release dateno data9 May 2007 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data16
Core clock speed300 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1190 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data123 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rateno data0.8
Floating-point processing powerno data0.0128 TFLOPS
ROPsno data1
TMUsno data2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCI

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2400 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 (12_1)9.0c
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 13 Watt

RX Vega 24 Mobile has a 221% more advanced lithography process.

GMA 3150, on the other hand, has 669% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 24 Mobile and GMA 3150. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 7 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 24 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 181 votes

Rate GMA 3150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 24 Mobile or GMA 3150, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.