GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs Radeon RX Vega 2
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 331 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 66 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 28.95 |
| Architecture | Vega (2017−2020) | Turing (2018−2022) |
| GPU code name | Vega Raven Ridge | TU116 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 7 January 2018 (8 years ago) | 23 April 2020 (6 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 128 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | no data | 1350 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1485 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 6,600 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 95.04 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 3.041 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 32 |
| TMUs | no data | 64 |
| L1 Cache | no data | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | no data | 1024 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | no data | medium sized |
| Interface | no data | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | no data | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 1500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 192.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | No outputs |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.2.140 |
| CUDA | - | 7.5 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 7 January 2018 | 23 April 2020 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 50 Watt |
RX Vega 2 has 233% lower power consumption.
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years.
We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 2 and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
