A800 PCIe 80 GB vs Radeon RX Vega 2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameVega Raven RidgeGA100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date7 January 2018 (8 years ago)8 November 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1286912
Core clock speedno data1065 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHz1410 MHz
Number of transistorsno data54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rateno data609.1
ROPsno data160
TMUsno data432
Tensor Coresno data432
L1 Cacheno data20.3 MB
L2 Cacheno data80 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataHBM2e
Maximum RAM amountno data80 GB
Memory bus widthno data5120 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1512 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1.94 TB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_1N/A
Shader Modelno dataN/A
OpenGLno dataN/A
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-8.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2018 8 November 2022
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 250 Watt

RX Vega 2 has 1567% lower power consumption.

A800 PCIe 80 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 71% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 2 and A800 PCIe 80 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 2 is a notebook graphics card while A800 PCIe 80 GB is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 272 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 9 votes

Rate A800 PCIe 80 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 2 or A800 PCIe 80 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.