Radeon RX 9050 OEM vs RX Vega 11

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking687not rated
Place by popularity99not in top-100
Power efficiency11.07no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)RDNA 4.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameRavenNavi 44
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date10 May 2018 (8 years ago)28 July 2026 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7041024
Core clock speed300 MHz1330 MHz
Boost clock speed1251 MHz2600 MHz
Number of transistors4,940 million29,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt92 Watt
Texture fill rate55.04166.4
Floating-point processing power1.761 TFLOPSno data
ROPs864
TMUs4464
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L0 Cacheno data256 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB
L3 Cacheno data16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 5.0 x16
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data144.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard Dependent1x HDMI 2.1b, 2x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)6.9
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.2
Vulkan1.31.4

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 May 2018 28 July 2026
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 92 Watt

RX Vega 11 has 163% lower power consumption.

RX 9050 OEM, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 11 and Radeon RX 9050 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 2086 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 11 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon RX 9050 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 11 or Radeon RX 9050 OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.