Radeon RX 8800 XT vs RX Vega 11

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking689not rated
Place by popularity62not in top-100
Power efficiency15.50no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)RDNA 4.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameRavenNavi 48
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date12 February 2018 (8 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7044096
Core clock speed300 MHz1295 MHz
Boost clock speed1240 MHz2430 MHz
Number of transistors4,940 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt220 Watt
Texture fill rate54.56622.1
Floating-point processing power1.971 TFLOPS19.91 TFLOPS
ROPs896
TMUs44256
Ray Tracing Coresno data64
L0 Cacheno data1 MB
L1 Cacheno data768 KB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB
L3 Cacheno data64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2438 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data624.1 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard Dependent1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.2
Vulkan1.31.3

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 220 Watt

RX Vega 11 has 780% lower power consumption.

RX 8800 XT, on the other hand, has a 250% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 11 and Radeon RX 8800 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 2090 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 11 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 149 votes

Rate Radeon RX 8800 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 11 or Radeon RX 8800 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.