RSX Reality Synthesizer vs Radeon RX Vega 11

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking690not rated
Place by popularity63not in top-100
Power efficiency15.50no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameRavenRSX-CXD5302
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date12 February 2018 (8 years ago)4 October 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores704no data
Core clock speed300 MHz550 MHz
Boost clock speed1240 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,940 million302 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate54.5613.20
Floating-point processing power1.971 TFLOPSno data
ROPs88
TMUs4424

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPIGP
WidthIGPIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared256 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1400 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data22.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard DependentNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)N/A
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.6ES 1.1
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.3-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 February 2018 4 October 2012
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 80 Watt

RX Vega 11 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 186% more advanced lithography process, and 220% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 11 and RSX Reality Synthesizer. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 2090 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 11 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 33 votes

Rate RSX Reality Synthesizer on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 11 or RSX Reality Synthesizer, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.