Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh vs Radeon RX Vega 11

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking687not rated
Place by popularity98not in top-100
Power efficiency11.07no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameRavenTU106
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date10 May 2018 (8 years ago)27 May 2019 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7041920
Core clock speed300 MHz945 MHz
Boost clock speed1251 MHz1380 MHz
Number of transistors4,940 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate55.04165.6
Floating-point processing power1.761 TFLOPS5.299 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs44120
Tensor Coresno data240
Ray Tracing Coresno data30
L1 Cacheno data1.9 MB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared6 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data336.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard DependentNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)6.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.31.2
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 May 2018 27 May 2019
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 80 Watt

RX Vega 11 has 129% lower power consumption.

RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 17% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 11 and Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 11 is a desktop graphics card while Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 2086 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 11 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 7 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 11 or Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.