Matrox Millennium G200 vs Radeon RX Vega 11

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking687not rated
Place by popularity98not in top-100
Power efficiency11.07no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)G200 (1998−1999)
GPU code nameRavenEclipse
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date10 May 2018 (8 years ago)1998 (28 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores704no data
Core clock speed300 MHz84 MHz
Boost clock speed1251 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,940 million10 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm350 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Wattno data
Texture fill rate55.040.08
Floating-point processing power1.761 TFLOPSno data
ROPs81
TMUs441

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCI
Lengthno data150 mm
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSGR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared143 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1.144 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard Dependent1x DVI, 1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)5.0
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)no data
OpenGL4.6None
OpenCL2.1None
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 14 nm 350 nm

RX Vega 11 has a 2400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 11 and Matrox Millennium G200. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 2086 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 11 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 10 votes

Rate Matrox Millennium G200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 11 or Matrox Millennium G200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.