GeForce 210 Rev. 2 vs Radeon RX Vega 11

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking687not rated
Place by popularity99not in top-100
Power efficiency11.07no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameRavenGT218
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date10 May 2018 (8 years ago)12 October 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores70416
Core clock speed300 MHz520 MHz
Boost clock speed1251 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,940 million260 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt31 Watt
Texture fill rate55.044.160
Floating-point processing power1.761 TFLOPS0.03936 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs448
L2 Cacheno data32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared400 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard Dependent1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)4.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.11.1
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA-1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 May 2018 12 October 2009
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 31 Watt

RX Vega 11 has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 186% more advanced lithography process.

210 Rev. 2, on the other hand, has 13% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 11 and GeForce 210 Rev. 2. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 2086 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 11 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 81 votes

Rate GeForce 210 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 11 or GeForce 210 Rev. 2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.