Arc Pro A60 vs Radeon RX Vega 11 Efficient

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated266
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data14.00
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameRavenDG2-256
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date23 April 2018 (8 years ago)6 June 2023 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7042048
Core clock speed300 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed1250 MHz2050 MHz
Number of transistors4,940 million11,500 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt130 Watt
Texture fill rate55.00262.4
Floating-point processing power1.76 TFLOPS8.397 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs44128
Tensor Coresno data256
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L2 Cacheno data12 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared12 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data384.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 2.0

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 April 2018 6 June 2023
Chip lithography 14 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 130 Watt

RX Vega 11 Efficient has 271% lower power consumption.

Arc Pro A60, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 133% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 11 Efficient and Arc Pro A60. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 11 Efficient is a desktop graphics card while Arc Pro A60 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 23 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 11 Efficient on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 25 votes

Rate Arc Pro A60 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 11 Efficient or Arc Pro A60, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.