GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition vs Radeon RX Vega 10

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
RX Vega 3 RX Vega 10 Vega 6 Mobile Vega 6 Mobile Efficient Vega 9 Mobile Zhongshan Subor Z+ Zhongshan Subor Z+ GPU
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
670MX 675MX 675MX Mac Edition 680M 680MX Mac Edition 775M Mac Edition 780M 780M Mac Edition 870M 880M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 10 and GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX Vega 10
2019
10 Watt
3.91
GTX 780M Mac Edition
2013
4 GB GDDR5, 122 Watt
6.20
+58.6%

780M Mac Edition outperforms RX Vega 10 by an impressive 59% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RX Vega 10 RX Vega 10
GTX 780M Mac Edition GTX 780M Mac Edition

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking762638
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency30.253.93
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameRavenGK104
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date8 January 2019 (7 years ago)8 November 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6401536
Core clock speed300 MHz771 MHz
Boost clock speed1301 MHz797 MHz
Number of transistors4,940 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt122 Watt
Texture fill rate52.04102.0
Floating-point processing power1.665 TFLOPS2.448 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs40128
L1 Cacheno data128 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPMXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data160.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD17
−41.2%
24−27
+41.2%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 40
−50%
60−65
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 12
−50%
18−20
+50%
Palworld 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 9
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 19
−57.9%
30−33
+57.9%
Counter-Strike 2 33
−51.5%
50−55
+51.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
Far Cry 5 12
−50%
18−20
+50%
Fortnite 33
−51.5%
50−55
+51.5%
Forza Horizon 4 17
−41.2%
24−27
+41.2%
Palworld 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 15
−40%
21−24
+40%
Valorant 50−55
−50.9%
80−85
+50.9%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 16
−50%
24−27
+50%
Counter-Strike 2 9
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 42
−54.8%
65−70
+54.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 5
−40%
7−8
+40%
Dota 2 32
−56.3%
50−55
+56.3%
Far Cry 5 11
−45.5%
16−18
+45.5%
Fortnite 15
−40%
21−24
+40%
Forza Horizon 4 14
−50%
21−24
+50%
Grand Theft Auto V 10
−40%
14−16
+40%
Metro Exodus 6
−50%
9−10
+50%
Palworld 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12
−50%
18−20
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12
−50%
18−20
+50%
Valorant 50−55
−50.9%
80−85
+50.9%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 17
−41.2%
24−27
+41.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Dota 2 29
−55.2%
45−50
+55.2%
Far Cry 5 10
−40%
14−16
+40%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−57.9%
30−33
+57.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−50%
24−27
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8
−50%
12−14
+50%
Valorant 50−55
−50.9%
80−85
+50.9%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 21−24
−52.2%
35−40
+52.2%
Palworld 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−33
−50%
45−50
+50%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−56.3%
50−55
+56.3%
Valorant 35−40
−57.9%
60−65
+57.9%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Palworld 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−50%
24−27
+50%
Valorant 16−18
−41.2%
24−27
+41.2%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%

This is how RX Vega 10 and GTX 780M Mac Edition compete in popular games:

  • GTX 780M Mac Edition is 41% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 3.91 6.20
Recency 8 January 2019 8 November 2013
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 122 Watt

RX Vega 10 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 1120% lower power consumption.

GTX 780M Mac Edition, on the other hand, has a 59% higher aggregate performance score.

The GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 10 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RX Vega 10 Radeon RX Vega 10
vs
HD 8870M Radeon HD 8870M
GTX 780M Mac Edition GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
vs
GTX 950M GeForce GTX 950M
RX Vega 10 Radeon RX Vega 10
vs
Radeon 540X Radeon 540X
UHD Graphics 630 Intel Graphics 630
vs
HD Graphics P4000 P4000
UHD Graphics 630 Intel Graphics 630
vs
RX 6650 XT 6650 XT
UHD Graphics 630 Intel Graphics 630
vs
Arc A350 A350
RX Vega 10 AMD RX Vega 10
vs
K5000M K5000M
RX Vega 10 AMD RX Vega 10
vs
HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
RX Vega 10 AMD RX Vega 10
vs
ATI HD 3730 3730
RX Vega 10 AMD RX Vega 10
vs
ATI 7500 Mac Edition 7500 Mac Edition
RX Vega 10 AMD RX Vega 10
vs
9600 GSO 512 9600 GSO 512
RX Vega 10 AMD RX Vega 10
vs
Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU 14-Core GPU
RX Vega 10 AMD RX Vega 10
vs
HD Graphics 12EU Mobile 12EU Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.4 1202 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 10 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 8 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 10 or GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.