Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs RX 9070 GRE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 9070 GRE with Radeon AI PRO R9700, including specs and performance data.

RX 9070 GRE
2025, $549
12 GB GDDR6, 220 Watt
56.22
AI PRO R9700
2025, $1,299
32 GB GDDR6, 300 Watt
65.45
+16.4%

AI PRO R9700 outperforms 9070 GRE by a moderate 16% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5029
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation60.8828.34
Power efficiency19.8516.95
ArchitectureRDNA 4.0 (2025−2026)RDNA 4.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameNavi 48Navi 48
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date8 May 2025 (1 year ago)23 July 2025 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$549 $1,299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

RX 9070 GRE has 115% better value for money than AI PRO R9700.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30724096
Core clock speed1420 MHz1660 MHz
Boost clock speed2790 MHz2920 MHz
Number of transistors53,900 million53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)220 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate535.7747.5
Floating-point processing power34.28 TFLOPS47.84 TFLOPS
ROPs96128
TMUs192256
Tensor Cores96128
Ray Tracing Cores4864
L0 Cache768 KB1 MB
L2 Cache8 MB8 MB
L3 Cache48 MB64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB32 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz2518 MHz
Memory bandwidth432.0 GB/s644.6 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI++

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.22.2
Vulkan1.41.3
DLSS++

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 9070 GRE 56.22
AI PRO R9700 65.45
+16.4%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 9070 GRE 23472
Samples: 190
AI PRO R9700 27326
+16.4%
Samples: 118

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD160180−190
+12.5%
1440p8595−100
+11.8%
4K5765−70
+14%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.43
+52.5%
7.22
1440p6.46
+52.8%
13.67
4K9.63
+51.8%
19.98
  • RX 9070 GRE has 52% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 9070 GRE has 53% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 9070 GRE has 52% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 170−180 200−210
+13%
Counter-Strike 2 280−290 300−310
+4.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 140−150 160−170
+14.3%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 160−170 190−200
+12.4%

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 170−180 200−210
+13%
Battlefield 5 160−170 180−190
+10.4%
Counter-Strike 2 280−290 300−310
+4.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 140−150 160−170
+14.3%
Far Cry 5 170−180 200−210
+14.9%
Fortnite 250−260 290−300
+12.8%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230 250−260
+13.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 200−210
+15.6%
Valorant 300−350 350−400
+7.7%

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 170−180 200−210
+13%
Battlefield 5 160−170 180−190
+10.4%
Counter-Strike 2 280−290 300−310
+4.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 300−310
+7.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 140−150 160−170
+14.3%
Far Cry 5 170−180 200−210
+14.9%
Fortnite 250−260 290−300
+12.8%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230 250−260
+13.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 160−170 180−190
+11.1%
Metro Exodus 140−150 160−170
+11.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 200−210
+15.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 364 400−450
+9.9%
Valorant 300−350 350−400
+7.7%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 160−170 180−190
+10.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 140−150 160−170
+14.3%
Far Cry 5 170−180 200−210
+14.9%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230 250−260
+13.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 200−210
+15.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 197 220−230
+11.7%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 250−260 290−300
+12.8%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 160−170 190−200
+14.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 400−450 450−500
+5.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 120−130 140−150
+13.8%
Metro Exodus 90−95 100−105
+8.7%
Valorant 350−400 400−450
+5.8%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 140−150 160−170
+14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80 85−90
+10.4%
Far Cry 5 140−150 160−170
+11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190 210−220
+14.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 142 160−170
+12.7%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160 170−180
+12.6%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 70−75 85−90
+14.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 130−140 160−170
+15.9%
Metro Exodus 55−60 65−70
+12.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 113 130−140
+15%
Valorant 300−350 350−400
+11.1%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 95−100 110−120
+11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40 40−45
+11.1%
Far Cry 5 85−90 100−105
+14.9%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140 150−160
+12.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100 110−120
+14.6%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80 90−95
+13.9%

This is how RX 9070 GRE and AI PRO R9700 compete in popular games:

  • AI PRO R9700 is 13% faster in 1080p
  • AI PRO R9700 is 12% faster in 1440p
  • AI PRO R9700 is 14% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 56.22 65.45
Recency 8 May 2025 23 July 2025
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 32 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 220 Watt 300 Watt

RX 9070 GRE has 27% lower power consumption.

AI PRO R9700, on the other hand, has a 16% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 months, and a 167% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 9070 GRE in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 9070 GRE is a desktop graphics card while Radeon AI PRO R9700 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 116 votes

Rate Radeon RX 9070 GRE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 40 votes

Rate Radeon AI PRO R9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 9070 GRE or Radeon AI PRO R9700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.