Quadro M4000 vs Radeon RX 9060

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 9060 with Quadro M4000, including specs and performance data.

RX 9060
2025
8 GB GDDR6, 132 Watt
42.15
+165%

RX 9060 outperforms M4000 by a whopping 165% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking105382
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.39
Power efficiency24.9110.34
ArchitectureRDNA 4.0 (2025−2026)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameNavi 44GM204
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date5 August 2025 (1 year ago)29 June 2015 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$791

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17921664
Core clock speed1700 MHz773 MHz
Boost clock speed2990 MHzno data
Number of transistors29,700 million5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)132 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate334.980.39
Floating-point processing power21.43 TFLOPS2.573 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs112104
Ray Tracing Cores28no data
L0 Cache448 KBno data
L1 Cacheno data624 KB
L2 Cache4 MB2 MB
L3 Cache32 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Width2-slot1" (2.5 cm)
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1 x 6-pin
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2518 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth322.3 GB/sUp to 192 GB/s
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1b, 2x DisplayPort 2.1a4x DisplayPort
Number of simultaneous displaysno data4
Multi-display synchronizationno dataQuadro Sync
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Prono data+
Mosaicno data+
High-Performance Video I/O6no data+
nView Desktop Managementno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12
Shader Model6.86.4
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL2.21.2
Vulkan1.31.1.126
CUDA-5.2

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 9060 42.15
+165%
Quadro M4000 15.92

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 9060 17668
+165%
Samples: 126
Quadro M4000 6672
Samples: 2333

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 42.15 15.92
Recency 5 August 2025 29 June 2015
Chip lithography 4 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 132 Watt 120 Watt

RX 9060 has a 165% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and a 86% more advanced lithography process.

Quadro M4000, on the other hand, has 9% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 9060 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M4000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 9060 is a desktop graphics card while Quadro M4000 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 86 votes

Rate Radeon RX 9060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 286 votes

Rate Quadro M4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 9060 or Quadro M4000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.