GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile vs Radeon RX 9060

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
9050 9050 4 GB 9050 8 GB 9050 OEM 9060 9060 XT 8 GB 9060 XT 16 GB 9060 XT LP
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
2050 Max-Q 2050 Mobile 2060 Mobile 2060 Max-Q 2060 Max-Q Refresh 2060 Mobile Refresh 2060 SUPER Mobile 2070 Mobile 2070 Max-Q 2070 Max-Q Refresh 2070 Mobile Refresh 2070 Super Max-Q 2070 Super Mobile 2080 Mobile 2080 Max-Q 2080 Super Max-Q 2080 Super Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 9060 with GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RX 9060
2025
8 GB GDDR6, 132 Watt
42.34
+17.5%

RX 9060 outperforms RTX 2080 Mobile by a moderate 18% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RX 9060 RX 9060
RTX 2080 Mobile RTX 2080 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking105156
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency24.9818.70
ArchitectureRDNA 4.0 (2025−2026)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameNavi 44TU104B
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date5 August 2025 (1 year ago)29 January 2019 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17922944
Core clock speed1700 MHz1380 MHz
Boost clock speed2990 MHz1590 MHz
Number of transistors29,700 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)132 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate334.9292.6
Floating-point processing power21.43 TFLOPS9.362 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs112184
Tensor Coresno data368
Ray Tracing Cores2846
L0 Cache448 KBno data
L1 Cacheno data2.9 MB
L2 Cache4 MB4 MB
L3 Cache32 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2518 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth322.3 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1b, 2x DisplayPort 2.1aNo outputs
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.86.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.21.2
Vulkan1.31.2.131
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD160−170
+11.9%
143
1440p110−12094
−14.5%
4K75−80
+15.4%
65

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 200−210 200−210
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85 80−85
Resident Evil 4 Remake 95−100 95−100

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 132 132
Counter-Strike 2 200−210 200−210
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85 80−85
Far Cry 5 104 104
Fortnite 206 206
Forza Horizon 4 147 147
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 243 243
Valorant 276 276

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 118 118
Counter-Strike 2 200−210 200−210
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 270−280
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85 80−85
Dota 2 131 131
Far Cry 5 97 97
Far Cry 6 100−110 100−110
Fortnite 169 169
Forza Horizon 4 145 145
Grand Theft Auto V 101 101
Metro Exodus 90 90
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 214 214
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 174 174
Valorant 266 266

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 117 117
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85 80−85
Dota 2 125 125
Far Cry 5 96 96
Forza Horizon 4 139 139
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 174 174
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95 95
Valorant 205 205

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 155 155

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 90−95 90−95
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260 250−260
Far Cry 6 65−70 65−70
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80 75−80
Metro Exodus 55 55
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 260 260

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 115 115
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45 40−45
Far Cry 5 82 82
Forza Horizon 4 122 122
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70 65−70

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 124 124

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 40−45 40−45
Far Cry 6 27−30 27−30
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80 75−80
Metro Exodus 35 35
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65 65
Valorant 240 240

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 68 68
Counter-Strike 2 40−45 40−45
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20 18−20
Dota 2 119 119
Far Cry 5 52 52
Forza Horizon 4 82 82
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 61 61

4K
Epic

Fortnite 61 61

This is how RX 9060 and RTX 2080 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RX 9060 is 12% faster in 1080p
  • RX 9060 is 17% faster in 1440p
  • RX 9060 is 15% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 61 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 42.34 36.02
Recency 5 August 2025 29 January 2019
Chip lithography 4 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 132 Watt 150 Watt

RX 9060 has a 18% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 67% more advanced lithography process, and 12% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 9060 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 9060 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RX 9060 Radeon RX 9060
vs
RX 7600 XT Radeon RX 7600 XT
RTX 2080 Mobile GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
vs
GTX 980 SLI Mobile GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile
RX 9060 Radeon RX 9060
vs
RTX 2070 Super GeForce RTX 2070 Super
Radeon 820M Radeon 820M
vs
Arc 130V Mobile Arc 130V Mobile
Arc 130V Mobile Arc 130V Mobile
vs
Arc Pro B390 Arc Pro B390
RX 9060 Radeon RX 9060
vs
HD Graphics 6000 HD Graphics 6000
RX 9060 Radeon RX 9060
vs
Quadro P620 Quadro P620
RX 9060 Radeon RX 9060
vs
GRID M60-4A GRID M60-4A
RX 9060 Radeon RX 9060
vs
Pro Vega II Radeon Pro Vega II
Apple M5 Max 32-Core GPU M5 Max 32-Core GPU
vs
Pro W5700X Radeon Pro W5700X
Apple M4 9-Core GPU M4 9 Core GPU
vs
Arc G3 Extreme Arc G3 Extreme
Radeon 8065S Radeon 8065S
vs
RTX 5000 Max-Q Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon 8065S Radeon 8065S
vs
RX 7600M XT Radeon RX 7600M XT

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.5 86 votes

Rate Radeon RX 9060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 180 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 9060 or GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.