Radeon RX 7800M vs RX 7900 GRE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 7900 GRE with Radeon RX 7800M, including specs and performance data.

RX 7900 GRE
2023, $549
16 GB GDDR6, 260 Watt
65.64
+56.4%

7900 GRE outperforms 7800M by an impressive 56% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking28106
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation71.10no data
Power efficiency19.6518.16
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code nameNavi 31Navi 32
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date27 July 2023 (3 years ago)11 September 2024 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$549 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51203840
Core clock speed1287 MHz1295 MHz
Boost clock speed2245 MHz2539 MHz
Number of transistors57,700 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)260 Watt180 Watt
Texture fill rate718.4609.4
Floating-point processing power45.98 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16096
TMUs320240
Ray Tracing Cores8060
L0 Cache2.5 MB960 KB
L1 Cache2.5 MB768 KB
L2 Cache6 MB4 MB
L3 Cache64 MB48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length276 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth576.0 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-CPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.9
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.22.0
Vulkan1.31.4

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 7900 GRE 65.64
+56.4%
RX 7800M 41.98

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 7900 GRE 27462
+56.4%
Samples: 2175
RX 7800M 17562
Samples: 56

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD206
+58.5%
130−140
1440p12980−85
−38%
4K77
+71.1%
45−50

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.67no data
1440p4.26no data
4K7.13no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 303
+59.5%
190−200
Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+56.5%
200−210
Cyberpunk 2077 208
+60%
130−140
Resident Evil 4 Remake 234
+67.1%
140−150

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 232
+65.7%
140−150
Battlefield 5 170−180
+60.9%
110−120
Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+56.5%
200−210
Cyberpunk 2077 184
+67.3%
110−120
Far Cry 5 174
+58.2%
110−120
Fortnite 300−350
+58.9%
190−200
Forza Horizon 4 260−270
+64.4%
160−170
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+57.3%
110−120
Valorant 350−400
+56.8%
250−260

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 150
+57.9%
95−100
Battlefield 5 170−180
+60.9%
110−120
Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+56.5%
200−210
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+63.5%
170−180
Cyberpunk 2077 158
+58%
100−105
Far Cry 5 168
+68%
100−105
Fortnite 300−350
+58.9%
190−200
Forza Horizon 4 260−270
+64.4%
160−170
Grand Theft Auto V 164
+64%
100−105
Metro Exodus 179
+62.7%
110−120
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+57.3%
110−120
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 382
+59.2%
240−250
Valorant 350−400
+56.8%
250−260

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 170−180
+60.9%
110−120
Cyberpunk 2077 148
+64.4%
90−95
Far Cry 5 155
+63.2%
95−100
Forza Horizon 4 260−270
+64.4%
160−170
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+57.3%
110−120
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 209
+60.8%
130−140
Valorant 350−400
+56.8%
250−260

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 300−350
+58.9%
190−200

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+57.7%
130−140
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 500−550
+72%
300−310
Grand Theft Auto V 130
+62.5%
80−85
Metro Exodus 111
+58.6%
70−75
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+59.1%
110−120
Valorant 450−500
+57.7%
300−310

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 160−170
+69%
100−105
Cyberpunk 2077 98
+63.3%
60−65
Far Cry 5 154
+62.1%
95−100
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
+62.1%
140−150
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 156
+64.2%
95−100

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160
+58.9%
95−100

4K
High

Atomic Heart 60−65
+77.1%
35−40
Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+67.3%
55−60
Grand Theft Auto V 151
+58.9%
95−100
Metro Exodus 71
+57.8%
45−50
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 125
+66.7%
75−80
Valorant 300−350
+59%
200−210

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 120−130
+65.3%
75−80
Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+67.3%
55−60
Cyberpunk 2077 45
+66.7%
27−30
Far Cry 5 107
+64.6%
65−70
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+62.7%
110−120
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+60%
60−65

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80
+58%
50−55

This is how RX 7900 GRE and RX 7800M compete in popular games:

  • RX 7900 GRE is 58% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7900 GRE is 61% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7900 GRE is 71% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 65.64 41.98
Recency 27 July 2023 11 September 2024
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 12 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 260 Watt 180 Watt

RX 7900 GRE has a 56% higher aggregate performance score, and a 33% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RX 7800M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 31% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 7900 GRE is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 7800M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 7900 GRE is a desktop graphics card while Radeon RX 7800M is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 1250 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7900 GRE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 16 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7800M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 7900 GRE or Radeon RX 7800M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.