RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell vs Radeon RX 7900 GRE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 7900 GRE with RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell, including specs and performance data.

RX 7900 GRE
2023, $549
16 GB GDDR6, 260 Watt
65.94
RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell
2025
32 GB GDDR7, 200 Watt
80.21
+21.6%

RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell outperforms 7900 GRE by a significant 22% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking289
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation71.16no data
Power efficiency19.6631.09
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameNavi 31GB203
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date27 July 2023 (3 years ago)18 March 2025 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$549 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512010496
Core clock speed1287 MHz1635 MHz
Boost clock speed2245 MHz2407 MHz
Number of transistors57,700 million45,600 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)260 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate718.4789.5
Floating-point processing power45.98 TFLOPS50.53 TFLOPS
ROPs160112
TMUs320328
Tensor Coresno data328
Ray Tracing Cores8082
L0 Cache2.5 MBno data
L1 Cache2.5 MB10.3 MB
L2 Cache6 MB64 MB
L3 Cache64 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length276 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount16 GB32 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth576.0 GB/s896.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C4x DisplayPort 2.1b
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.31.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 7900 GRE 65.94
RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell 80.21
+21.6%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 7900 GRE 27470
Samples: 2170
RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell 33415
+21.6%
Samples: 140

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD206250−260
+21.4%
1440p129150−160
+16.3%
4K7790−95
+16.9%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.67no data
1440p4.26no data
4K7.13no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 303 350−400
+15.5%
Counter-Strike 2 300−350 350−400
+11.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 208 250−260
+20.2%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 234 280−290
+19.7%

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 232 280−290
+20.7%
Battlefield 5 170−180 210−220
+18.6%
Counter-Strike 2 300−350 350−400
+11.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 184 220−230
+19.6%
Far Cry 5 174 210−220
+20.7%
Fortnite 300−350 350−400
+15.9%
Forza Horizon 4 260−270 300−310
+14.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 210−220
+21.4%
Valorant 350−400 450−500
+14.8%

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 150 180−190
+20%
Battlefield 5 170−180 210−220
+18.6%
Counter-Strike 2 300−350 350−400
+11.8%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 300−310
+7.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 158 190−200
+20.3%
Far Cry 5 168 200−210
+19%
Fortnite 300−350 350−400
+15.9%
Forza Horizon 4 260−270 300−310
+14.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 164 190−200
+15.9%
Metro Exodus 179 210−220
+17.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 210−220
+21.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 382 450−500
+17.8%
Valorant 350−400 450−500
+14.8%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 170−180 210−220
+18.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 148 180−190
+21.6%
Far Cry 5 155 180−190
+16.1%
Forza Horizon 4 260−270 300−310
+14.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 210−220
+21.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 209 250−260
+19.6%
Valorant 350−400 450−500
+14.8%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 300−350 350−400
+15.9%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 200−210 240−250
+17.1%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 500−550 600−650
+16.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 130 150−160
+15.4%
Metro Exodus 111 130−140
+17.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 210−220
+20%
Valorant 450−500 550−600
+16.3%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 160−170 200−210
+18.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 98 110−120
+12.2%
Far Cry 5 154 180−190
+16.9%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230 270−280
+18.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 156 180−190
+15.4%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160 180−190
+19.2%

4K
High

Atomic Heart 60−65 75−80
+21%
Counter-Strike 2 90−95 110−120
+19.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 151 180−190
+19.2%
Metro Exodus 71 85−90
+19.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 125 150−160
+20%
Valorant 300−350 350−400
+10.1%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 120−130 150−160
+21%
Counter-Strike 2 90−95 110−120
+19.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 45 50−55
+11.1%
Far Cry 5 107 130−140
+21.5%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180 210−220
+17.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100 110−120
+14.6%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80 95−100
+20.3%

This is how RX 7900 GRE and RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is 21% faster in 1080p
  • RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is 16% faster in 1440p
  • RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is 17% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 65.94 80.21
Recency 27 July 2023 18 March 2025
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 32 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 260 Watt 200 Watt

RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell has a 22% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 23% lower power consumption.

The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 7900 GRE in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 7900 GRE is a desktop graphics card while RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 1250 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7900 GRE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 125 votes

Rate RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 7900 GRE or RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.