RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs Radeon RX 7900 GRE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 7900 GRE with RTX 5000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

RX 7900 GRE
2023, $549
16 GB GDDR6, 260 Watt
65.63
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
2023
32 GB GDDR6, 250 Watt
73.98
+12.7%

RTX 5000 Ada Generation outperforms 7900 GRE by a moderate 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2716
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation70.91no data
Power efficiency19.6523.03
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 31AD102
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date27 July 2023 (3 years ago)9 August 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$549 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512012800
Core clock speed1287 MHz1155 MHz
Boost clock speed2245 MHz2550 MHz
Number of transistors57,700 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)260 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate718.41,020
Floating-point processing power45.98 TFLOPS65.28 TFLOPS
ROPs160176
TMUs320400
Tensor Coresno data400
Ray Tracing Cores80100
L0 Cache2.5 MBno data
L1 Cache2.5 MB12.5 MB
L2 Cache6 MB72 MB
L3 Cache64 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length276 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB32 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth576.0 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C4x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 7900 GRE 65.63
RTX 5000 Ada Generation 73.98
+12.7%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 7900 GRE 27458
Samples: 2200
RTX 5000 Ada Generation 30951
+12.7%
Samples: 234

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD206230−240
+11.7%
1440p129140−150
+8.5%
4K7785−90
+10.4%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.67no data
1440p4.26no data
4K7.13no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 300−350 350−400
+11.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 208 230−240
+10.6%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 234 260−270
+11.1%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 170−180 190−200
+8%
Counter-Strike 2 300−350 350−400
+11.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 184 200−210
+8.7%
Far Cry 5 174 190−200
+9.2%
Fortnite 300−350
+0.7%
300−310
Forza Horizon 4 260−270 290−300
+10.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 190−200
+9.8%
Valorant 350−400 400−450
+2%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 170−180 190−200
+8%
Counter-Strike 2 300−350 350−400
+11.8%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 300−310
+7.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 158 170−180
+7.6%
Far Cry 5 168 180−190
+7.1%
Far Cry 6 169 190−200
+12.4%
Fortnite 300−350
+0.7%
300−310
Forza Horizon 4 260−270 290−300
+10.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 164 180−190
+9.8%
Metro Exodus 179 200−210
+11.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 190−200
+9.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 382 400−450
+4.7%
Valorant 350−400 400−450
+2%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 170−180 190−200
+8%
Cyberpunk 2077 148 160−170
+8.1%
Far Cry 5 155 170−180
+9.7%
Forza Horizon 4 260−270 290−300
+10.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 190−200
+9.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 209 230−240
+10%
Valorant 350−400 400−450
+2%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 300−350
+0.7%
300−310

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 200−210 230−240
+12.2%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 500−550 550−600
+6.6%
Far Cry 6 136 150−160
+10.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 130 140−150
+7.7%
Metro Exodus 111 120−130
+8.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 190−200
+8.6%
Valorant 450−500 500−550
+5.7%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 160−170 190−200
+12.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 98 110−120
+12.2%
Far Cry 5 154 170−180
+10.4%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230 250−260
+10.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 156 170−180
+9%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160 170−180
+12.6%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 90−95 100−105
+8.7%
Far Cry 6 87 95−100
+9.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 151 170−180
+12.6%
Metro Exodus 71 80−85
+12.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 125 140−150
+12%
Valorant 300−350 350−400
+10.1%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 120−130 130−140
+4.8%
Counter-Strike 2 90−95 100−105
+8.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 45 50−55
+11.1%
Far Cry 5 107 120−130
+12.1%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180 200−210
+11.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100 100−105
+4.2%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80 85−90
+7.6%

This is how RX 7900 GRE and RTX 5000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5000 Ada Generation is 12% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5000 Ada Generation is 9% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 5000 Ada Generation is 10% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 65.63 73.98
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 32 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 260 Watt 250 Watt

RTX 5000 Ada Generation has a 13% higher aggregate performance score, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 4% lower power consumption.

The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 7900 GRE in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 7900 GRE is a desktop graphics card while RTX 5000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 1251 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7900 GRE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 95 votes

Rate RTX 5000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 7900 GRE or RTX 5000 Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.