Arc Pro B70 vs Radeon RX 7900 GRE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 7900 GRE with Arc Pro B70, including specs and performance data.

RX 7900 GRE
2023, $549
16 GB GDDR6, 260 Watt
65.66
+46.8%

7900 GRE outperforms Pro B70 by a considerable 47% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2897
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation71.0127.29
Power efficiency19.6815.15
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)Xe2-HPG (2025−2026)
GPU code nameNavi 31BMG-G31
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date27 July 2023 (3 years ago)26 March 2026 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$549 $949

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

RX 7900 GRE has 160% better value for money than Arc Pro B70.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51204096
Core clock speed1287 MHz2280 MHz
Boost clock speed2245 MHz2800 MHz
Number of transistors57,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology5 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)260 Watt230 Watt
Texture fill rate718.4716.8
Floating-point processing power45.98 TFLOPSno data
ROPs160128
TMUs320256
Ray Tracing Cores8032
L0 Cache2.5 MBno data
L1 Cache2.5 MBno data
L2 Cache6 MB24 MB
L3 Cache64 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length276 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB32 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz2375 MHz
Memory bandwidth576.0 GB/s608.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI++

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.31.4

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 7900 GRE 65.66
+46.8%
Arc Pro B70 44.72

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 7900 GRE 27470
+46.8%
Samples: 2190
Arc Pro B70 18708
Samples: 34

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD206
+47.1%
140−150
1440p12985−90
−34.1%
4K77
+54%
50−55

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.67
+60.7%
6.78
1440p4.26
+61.9%
11.16
4K7.13
+62.4%
18.98
  • RX 7900 GRE has 61% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 7900 GRE has 62% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 7900 GRE has 62% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 303
+51.5%
200−210
Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+49%
210−220
Cyberpunk 2077 208
+48.6%
140−150

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 232
+54.7%
150−160
Battlefield 5 170−180
+47.5%
120−130
Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+49%
210−220
Cyberpunk 2077 184
+53.3%
120−130
Far Cry 5 174
+58.2%
110−120
Fortnite 300−350
+51%
200−210
Forza Horizon 4 260−270
+54.7%
170−180
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+57.3%
110−120
Valorant 350−400
+50.8%
260−270

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 150
+50%
100−105
Battlefield 5 170−180
+47.5%
120−130
Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+49%
210−220
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+54.4%
180−190
Cyberpunk 2077 158
+58%
100−105
Far Cry 5 168
+52.7%
110−120
Far Cry 6 169
+53.6%
110−120
Fortnite 300−350
+51%
200−210
Forza Horizon 4 260−270
+54.7%
170−180
Grand Theft Auto V 164
+49.1%
110−120
Metro Exodus 179
+49.2%
120−130
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+57.3%
110−120
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 382
+46.9%
260−270
Valorant 350−400
+50.8%
260−270

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 170−180
+47.5%
120−130
Cyberpunk 2077 148
+48%
100−105
Far Cry 5 155
+55%
100−105
Forza Horizon 4 260−270
+54.7%
170−180
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+57.3%
110−120
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 209
+49.3%
140−150
Valorant 350−400
+50.8%
260−270

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 300−350
+51%
200−210

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+57.7%
130−140
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 500−550
+47.4%
350−400
Far Cry 6 136
+51.1%
90−95
Grand Theft Auto V 130
+52.9%
85−90
Metro Exodus 111
+48%
75−80
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+59.1%
110−120
Valorant 450−500
+57.7%
300−310

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 160−170
+53.6%
110−120
Cyberpunk 2077 98
+50.8%
65−70
Far Cry 5 154
+54%
100−105
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
+51.3%
150−160
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 156
+56%
100−105

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160
+51%
100−105

4K
High

Atomic Heart 60−65
+55%
40−45
Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+53.3%
60−65
Far Cry 6 87
+58.2%
55−60
Grand Theft Auto V 151
+51%
100−105
Metro Exodus 71
+57.8%
45−50
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 125
+47.1%
85−90
Valorant 300−350
+51.4%
210−220

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 120−130
+55%
80−85
Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+53.3%
60−65
Cyberpunk 2077 45
+50%
30−33
Far Cry 5 107
+52.9%
70−75
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+49.2%
120−130
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+47.7%
65−70

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80
+58%
50−55

This is how RX 7900 GRE and Arc Pro B70 compete in popular games:

  • RX 7900 GRE is 47% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7900 GRE is 52% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7900 GRE is 54% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 65.66 44.72
Recency 27 July 2023 26 March 2026
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 32 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 260 Watt 230 Watt

RX 7900 GRE has a 47% higher aggregate performance score.

Arc Pro B70, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 12% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 7900 GRE is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc Pro B70 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 7900 GRE is a desktop graphics card while Arc Pro B70 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 1251 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7900 GRE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 19 votes

Rate Arc Pro B70 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 7900 GRE or Arc Pro B70, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.