Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) vs RX 7800M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
7600M 7600M XT 7600S 7700S 7800M 7900M
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
2 5 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 9

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 7800M and Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 7800M
2024
12 GB GDDR6, 180 Watt
41.93
+404%

7800M outperforms 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) by a whopping 404% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RX 7800M RX 7800M
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking105562
Place by popularitynot in top-10029
Power efficiency18.0142.89
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)Vega (2017−2020)
GPU code nameNavi 32Vega
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date11 September 2024 (1 year ago)7 January 2020 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3840512
Core clock speed1295 MHzno data
Boost clock speed2539 MHz2100 MHz
Number of transistors28,100 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology5 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate609.4no data
ROPs96no data
TMUs240no data
Ray Tracing Cores60no data
L0 Cache960 KBno data
L1 Cache768 KBno data
L2 Cache4 MBno data
L3 Cache48 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount12 GBno data
Memory bus width192 Bitno data
Memory clock speed2250 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth432.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependentno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12_1
Shader Model6.9no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.4-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD110−120
+400%
22
−400%
1440p80−85
+400%
16
−400%
4K50−55
+400%
10
−400%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 63
+0%
63
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
+0%
18
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 39
+0%
39
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 43
+0%
43
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 13
+0%
13
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 21
+0%
21
+0%
Fortnite 47
+0%
47
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Valorant 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 33
+0%
33
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 19
+0%
19
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 48
+0%
48
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
+0%
9
+0%
Dota 2 51
+0%
51
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 20
+0%
20
+0%
Fortnite 31
+0%
31
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 18
+0%
18
+0%
Metro Exodus 16
+0%
16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21
+0%
21
+0%
Valorant 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 30
+0%
30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
+0%
9
+0%
Dota 2 48
+0%
48
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 19
+0%
19
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
+0%
14
+0%
Valorant 37
+0%
37
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 18
+0%
18
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21
+0%
21
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 9
+0%
9
+0%
Metro Exodus 10
+0%
10
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 22
+0%
22
+0%
Valorant 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21
+0%
21
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5
+0%
5
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 16
+0%
16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 10
+0%
10
+0%
Metro Exodus 6
+0%
6
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 18
+0%
18
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry 5 8
+0%
8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

This is how RX 7800M and RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) compete in popular games:

  • RX 7800M is 400% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7800M is 400% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7800M is 400% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 41.93 8.32
Recency 11 September 2024 7 January 2020
Chip lithography 5 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 15 Watt

RX 7800M has a 404% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), on the other hand, has 1100% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 7800M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RX 7800M Radeon RX 7800M
vs
RX 6850M XT Radeon RX 6850M XT
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
vs
GTX 960A GeForce GTX 960A
RX 7800M Radeon RX 7800M
vs
RTX 4060 Mobile GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
Arc Graphics 140V Arc Graphics 140V
vs
Arc Graphics 32EU Arc Graphics 32EU
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
vs
UHD Graphics 630 UHD Graphics 630
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
vs
RX Vega 3 Radeon RX Vega 3
RTX 5080 Mobile GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile
vs
Radeon 8065S Radeon 8065S
RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070
vs
Apple M5 Max 32-Core GPU M5 Max 32-Core GPU
Radeon 8050S Radeon 8050S
vs
RTX A4000 Mobile RTX A4000 Mobile
Radeon 8060S Radeon 8060S
vs
GTX 650 GeForce GTX 650
Radeon 860M Radeon 860M
vs
Apple M4 32-core GPU M4 32 core GPU
Arc Graphics 140T Arc Graphics 140T
vs
8600 GT GeForce 8600 GT
Arc Graphics 140T Arc Graphics 140T
vs
MX150 GP107 GeForce MX150 GP107

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.1 16 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7800M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 1784 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 7800M or Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.