RTX PRO 3000 Blackwell Mobile vs Radeon RX 7800M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 7800M with RTX PRO 3000 Blackwell Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RX 7800M
2024
12 GB GDDR6, 180 Watt
42.28
RTX PRO 3000 Blackwell Mobile
2025
12 GB GDDR7, 60 Watt
45.91
+8.6%

RTX PRO 3000 Blackwell Mobile outperforms 7800M by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking10487
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency18.1759.19
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameNavi 32GB205
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date11 September 2024 (1 year ago)19 March 2025 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38405888
Core clock speed1295 MHz848 MHz
Boost clock speed2335 MHz1605 MHz
Number of transistors28,100 million31,100 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate560.4295.3
Floating-point processing power35.87 TFLOPS18.9 TFLOPS
ROPs9680
TMUs240184
Tensor Coresno data184
Ray Tracing Cores6046
L0 Cache960 KBno data
L1 Cache768 KB5.8 MB
L2 Cache4 MB48 MB
L3 Cache48 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount12 GB12 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth432.0 GB/s672.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.31.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD110−120
−11.8%
123
+11.8%
1440p60−65
−15%
69
+15%
4K40−45
−10%
44
+10%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Palworld 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Fortnite 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Palworld 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Valorant 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Fortnite 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 154
+0%
154
+0%
Metro Exodus 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Palworld 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Palworld 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 117
+0%
117
+0%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Valorant 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Palworld 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Valorant 280−290
+0%
280−290
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Palworld 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

This is how RX 7800M and RTX PRO 3000 Blackwell Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 3000 Blackwell Mobile is 12% faster in 1080p
  • RTX PRO 3000 Blackwell Mobile is 15% faster in 1440p
  • RTX PRO 3000 Blackwell Mobile is 10% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 58 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 42.28 45.91
Recency 11 September 2024 19 March 2025
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 60 Watt

RTX PRO 3000 Blackwell Mobile has a 9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 months, and 200% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon RX 7800M and RTX PRO 3000 Blackwell Mobile.

Be aware that Radeon RX 7800M is a notebook graphics card while RTX PRO 3000 Blackwell Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 16 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7800M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 16 votes

Rate RTX PRO 3000 Blackwell Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 7800M or RTX PRO 3000 Blackwell Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.