GeForce RTX 5090 D vs Radeon RX 7800 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 7800 XT and GeForce RTX 5090 D, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 7800 XT
2023, $499
16 GB GDDR6, 263 Watt
58.73
RTX 5090 D
2025, $2,299
32 GB GDDR7, 575 Watt
100.00
+70.3%

RTX 5090 D outperforms 7800 XT by an impressive 70% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking471
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation70.0822.57
Power efficiency17.3113.48
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameNavi 32GB202
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date25 August 2023 (3 years ago)30 January 2025 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 $2,299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

RX 7800 XT has 211% better value for money than RTX 5090 D.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384021760
Core clock speed1295 MHz2017 MHz
Boost clock speed2430 MHz2407 MHz
Number of transistors28,100 million92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)263 Watt575 Watt
Texture fill rate583.21,636.8
Floating-point processing power37.32 TFLOPS104.8 TFLOPS
ROPs96176
TMUs240680
Tensor Coresno data680
Ray Tracing Cores60170
L0 Cache960 KBno data
L1 Cache768 KB21.3 MB
L2 Cache4 MB96 MB
L3 Cache64 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length267 mm304 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount16 GB32 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed2438 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth624.1 GB/s1.79 TB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.11x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
HDMI++

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.31.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 7800 XT 58.73
RTX 5090 D 100.00
+70.3%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 7800 XT 24469
Samples: 11347
RTX 5090 D 42042
+71.8%
Samples: 59

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD214350−400
+63.6%
1440p123200−210
+62.6%
4K72
−40%
120−130

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.33
+64.5%
6.57
1440p4.06
+64.7%
11.50
4K6.93
+63.8%
19.16
  • RX 7800 XT has 65% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 7800 XT has 65% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 7800 XT has 64% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 324 550−600
+69.8%
Counter-Strike 2 351 550−600
+56.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 248 400−450
+61.3%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 272 450−500
+65.4%

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 243 400−450
+64.6%
Battlefield 5 160−170 280−290
+68.7%
Counter-Strike 2 355 600−650
+69%
Cyberpunk 2077 196 300−310
+53.1%
Far Cry 5 204 300−310
+47.1%
Fortnite 270−280 450−500
+65.4%
Forza Horizon 4 278 450−500
+61.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 290−300
+67.6%
Valorant 300−350 550−600
+61.8%

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 145 240−250
+65.5%
Battlefield 5 160−170 280−290
+68.7%
Counter-Strike 2 283 450−500
+59%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 450−500
+61.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 163 270−280
+65.6%
Far Cry 5 196 300−310
+53.1%
Fortnite 270−280 450−500
+65.4%
Forza Horizon 4 261 400−450
+53.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 178 300−310
+68.5%
Metro Exodus 172 290−300
+68.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 290−300
+67.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 366 600−650
+63.9%
Valorant 300−350 550−600
+61.8%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 160−170 280−290
+68.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 150 250−260
+66.7%
Far Cry 5 182 300−310
+64.8%
Forza Horizon 4 222 350−400
+57.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 290−300
+67.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 200 300−310
+50%
Valorant 300−350 550−600
+61.8%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 270−280 450−500
+65.4%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 175 290−300
+65.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 400−450 750−800
+67.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 140 230−240
+64.3%
Metro Exodus 106 180−190
+69.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 290−300
+65.7%
Valorant 350−400 650−700
+63.3%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 140−150 240−250
+64.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 99 160−170
+61.6%
Far Cry 5 176 290−300
+64.8%
Forza Horizon 4 202 300−310
+48.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 147 250−260
+70.1%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160 250−260
+65.6%

4K
High

Atomic Heart 50−55 85−90
+63.5%
Counter-Strike 2 42 70−75
+66.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 152 250−260
+64.5%
Metro Exodus 63 100−105
+58.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 118 200−210
+69.5%
Valorant 300−350 500−550
+57.2%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100−110 170−180
+63.5%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80 130−140
+66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 45 75−80
+66.7%
Far Cry 5 104 170−180
+63.5%
Forza Horizon 4 164 270−280
+64.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100 160−170
+66.7%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80 130−140
+64.6%

This is how RX 7800 XT and RTX 5090 D compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5090 D is 64% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5090 D is 63% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 5090 D is 67% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 58.73 100.00
Recency 25 August 2023 30 January 2025
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 32 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 263 Watt 575 Watt

RX 7800 XT has 54% lower power consumption.

RTX 5090 D, on the other hand, has a 70% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The GeForce RTX 5090 D is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 7800 XT in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 5365 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7800 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 2212 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5090 D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 7800 XT or GeForce RTX 5090 D, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.