RTX 5880 Ada Generation vs Radeon RX 7700 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 7700 XT with RTX 5880 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

RX 7700 XT
2023, $449
12 GB GDDR6, 245 Watt
54.34
RTX 5880 Ada Generation
2024
48 GB GDDR6, 285 Watt
59.86
+10.2%

RTX 5880 Ada Generation outperforms 7700 XT by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5544
Place by popularity84not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation70.78no data
Power efficiency17.2916.38
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 32AD102
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date25 August 2023 (3 years ago)5 January 2024 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$449 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores345614080
Core clock speed1435 MHz975 MHz
Boost clock speed2544 MHz2460 MHz
Number of transistors28,100 million76.3 billion
Manufacturing process technology5 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)245 Watt285 Watt
Texture fill rate549.51,082.4
Floating-point processing power35.17 TFLOPSno data
ROPs96176
TMUs216440
Tensor Coresno data440
Ray Tracing Cores54110
L0 Cache864 KBno data
L1 Cache768 KB13.8 MB
L2 Cache2 MB72 MB
L3 Cache48 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB48 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth432.0 GB/s864.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C4x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.9
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.31.4
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 7700 XT 54.34
RTX 5880 Ada Generation 59.86
+10.2%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 7700 XT 22782
Samples: 3018
RTX 5880 Ada Generation 25095
+10.2%
Samples: 8

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD185200−210
+8.1%
1440p102110−120
+7.8%
4K5960−65
+1.7%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.43no data
1440p4.40no data
4K7.61no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 351
+0.3%
350−400
Cyberpunk 2077 193 210−220
+8.8%
Hogwarts Legacy 196 210−220
+7.1%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 229 250−260
+9.2%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 160−170 170−180
+6.3%
Counter-Strike 2 344 350−400
+1.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 158 170−180
+7.6%
Far Cry 5 188 200−210
+6.4%
Fortnite 240−250 260−270
+6.1%
Forza Horizon 4 278 300−310
+7.9%
Hogwarts Legacy 161 170−180
+5.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 190−200
+9.8%
Valorant 300−350
+5%
300−310

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 160−170 170−180
+6.3%
Counter-Strike 2 243 260−270
+7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 300−310
+7.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 132 140−150
+6.1%
Far Cry 5 181 190−200
+5%
Fortnite 240−250 260−270
+6.1%
Forza Horizon 4 272 290−300
+6.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 166 180−190
+8.4%
Hogwarts Legacy 119 130−140
+9.2%
Metro Exodus 152 160−170
+5.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 190−200
+9.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 295 300−310
+1.7%
Valorant 300−350
+5%
300−310

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 160−170 170−180
+6.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 122 130−140
+6.6%
Far Cry 5 167 180−190
+7.8%
Forza Horizon 4 231 250−260
+8.2%
Hogwarts Legacy 91 100−105
+9.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 190−200
+9.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 168 180−190
+7.1%
Valorant 300−350
+5%
300−310

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 240−250 260−270
+6.1%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 127 130−140
+2.4%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 400−450
+1.8%
400−450
Grand Theft Auto V 105 110−120
+4.8%
Metro Exodus 90 95−100
+5.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 190−200
+8.6%
Valorant 350−400 400−450
+9.9%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140 140−150
+3.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 80 85−90
+6.3%
Far Cry 5 157 170−180
+8.3%
Forza Horizon 4 197 210−220
+6.6%
Hogwarts Legacy 67 70−75
+4.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120 130−140
+8.3%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160 160−170
+6%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 31
+3.3%
30−33
Grand Theft Auto V 112 120−130
+7.1%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40 40−45
+5.3%
Metro Exodus 57 60−65
+5.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 89 95−100
+6.7%
Valorant 300−350
+3.7%
300−310

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 90−95 100−105
+6.4%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75 75−80
+5.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 36
+2.9%
35−40
Far Cry 5 82 90−95
+9.8%
Forza Horizon 4 134 140−150
+4.5%
Hogwarts Legacy 36
+2.9%
35−40
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100 100−105
+4.2%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80 85−90
+7.6%

This is how RX 7700 XT and RTX 5880 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5880 Ada Generation is 8% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5880 Ada Generation is 8% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 5880 Ada Generation is 2% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 54.34 59.86
Recency 25 August 2023 5 January 2024
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 48 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 245 Watt 285 Watt

RX 7700 XT has 14% lower power consumption.

RTX 5880 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 10% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 months, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The RTX 5880 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 7700 XT in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 7700 XT is a desktop graphics card while RTX 5880 Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 2920 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7700 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 24 votes

Rate RTX 5880 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 7700 XT or RTX 5880 Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.