RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile vs Radeon RX 7600 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
7400 7600 7600 XT 7650 GRE 7700 XT 7800 XT 7900 GRE 7900 XT 7900 XTX Steam Machine GPU
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
500 Blackwell Embedded 500 Blackwell Mobile 1000 Blackwell Mobile 2000 Blackwell Embedded 2000 Blackwell Mobile 3000 Blackwell Mobile 4000 Blackwell Embedded 4000 Blackwell Mobile 5000 Blackwell Embedded 5000 Blackwell Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 7600 XT with RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RX 7600 XT
2024, $329
16 GB GDDR6, 190 Watt
41.64
+54%
RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
2025
6 GB GDDR7, 35 Watt
27.04

7600 XT outperforms RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile by an impressive 54% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RX 7600 XT RX 7600 XT
RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking110243
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation76.29no data
Power efficiency16.9859.86
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameNavi 33GB207
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date8 January 2024 (2 years ago)19 March 2025 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20481792
Core clock speed1980 MHz2235 MHz
Boost clock speed2755 MHz2520 MHz
Number of transistors13,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology6 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)190 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate352.6141.1
Floating-point processing power22.57 TFLOPS9.032 TFLOPS
ROPs6424
TMUs12856
Tensor Coresno data56
Ray Tracing Cores3214
L0 Cache512 KBno data
L1 Cache512 KB1.8 MB
L2 Cache2 MB24 MB
L3 Cache32 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x16
Length204 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount16 GB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s336.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1Portable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.31.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD90−95
+52.5%
59
−34.4%
1440p55−60
+44.7%
38
−30.9%
4K40−45
+37.9%
29
−27.5%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.66no data
1440p5.98no data
4K8.23no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry 5 99
+0%
99
+0%
Fortnite 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Valorant 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry 5 89
+0%
89
+0%
Fortnite 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 113
+0%
113
+0%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Valorant 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry 5 85
+0%
85
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 59
+0%
59
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 59
+0%
59
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 29
+0%
29
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

This is how RX 7600 XT and RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RX 7600 XT is 53% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7600 XT is 45% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7600 XT is 38% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 55 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 41.64 27.04
Recency 8 January 2024 19 March 2025
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 190 Watt 35 Watt

RX 7600 XT has a 54% higher aggregate performance score, and a 167% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 17% more advanced lithography process, and 82% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 7600 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 7600 XT is a desktop graphics card while RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RX 7600 XT Radeon RX 7600 XT
vs
TITAN V TITAN V
RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
vs
Quadro P5200 Quadro P5200
RX 7600 XT Radeon RX 7600 XT
vs
RX 6650 XT Radeon RX 6650 XT
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
vs
RTX A2000 Max-Q 8 GB RTX A2000 Max-Q 8 GB
RTX 4070 SUPER RTX 4070 SUPER
vs
Arc Graphics 130V Arc Graphics 130V
RTX 4070 SUPER RTX 4070 SUPER
vs
Graphics (Ryzen 9000) Graphics (Ryzen 9000)
RTX 4070 SUPER RTX 4070 SUPER
vs
Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU M4 Pro 20-Core GPU
RX 7600 XT RX 7600 XT
vs
RTX PRO 3000 Blackwell Mobile RTX PRO 3000 Blackwell Mobile
RX 7600 XT RX 7600 XT
vs
Jetson T5000 Jetson T5000
RX 7600 XT RX 7600 XT
vs
N1X 48SM N1X 48SM
RTX 5880 Ada Generation RTX 5880 Ada Generation
vs
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
RTX 4090 D RTX 4090 D
vs
Moore Threads MTT S50
RTX 3050 6 GB RTX 3050 6 GB
vs
Qualcomm SD X2 Adreno X2-45 SD X2 Adreno X2-45

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.1 1664 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 9 votes

Rate RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 7600 XT or RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.