Rubin Ultra GPU vs Radeon RX 6900 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking35not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation27.88no data
Power efficiency16.49no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)Rubin Ultra (2027)
GPU code nameNavi 21GR110
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date28 October 2020 (5 years ago)2027
Launch price (MSRP)$999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512057344
Core clock speed1825 MHz700 MHz
Boost clock speed2250 MHz2267 MHz
Number of transistors26,800 million670,000 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt3600 Watt
Texture fill rate720.04,062.5
Floating-point processing power23.04 TFLOPS260 TFLOPS
ROPs12824
TMUs3201792
Tensor Coresno data1792
Ray Tracing Cores80no data
L0 Cache1.3 MBno data
L1 Cache1 MB112 MB
L2 Cache4 MB128 MB
L3 Cache128 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 6.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width3-slotSXM Module
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM4e
Maximum RAM amount16 GB1024 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit32768 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1900 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s31.1 TB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-CNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)N/A
Shader Model6.8N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA-10.7
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 1024 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 3600 Watt

RX 6900 XT has 1100% lower power consumption.

Rubin Ultra GPU, on the other hand, has a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 6900 XT and Rubin Ultra GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6900 XT is a desktop graphics card while Rubin Ultra GPU is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 4483 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6900 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Rubin Ultra GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 6900 XT or Rubin Ultra GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.