Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot vs RX 6800 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
5900 5900 XT 5950 5950 XT 6800 6800 3456SP 6800 XT 6850 XT 6900 6900 XT 6950 XT
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
PRO W7400 PRO W7500 PRO W7600 PRO W7700 PRO W7800 PRO W7800 48 GB PRO W7900 PRO W7900 Dual Slot PRO W7900D

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6800 XT with Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot, including specs and performance data.

RX 6800 XT
2020, $649
16 GB GDDR6, 300 Watt
59.91
+90.6%
PRO W7900 Dual Slot
2024, $3,499
48 GB GDDR6, 295 Watt
31.44

6800 XT outperforms PRO W7900 Dual Slot by an impressive 91% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RX 6800 XT RX 6800 XT
PRO W7900 Dual Slot PRO W7900 Dual Slot

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking43204
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation38.454.15
Power efficiency15.578.31
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)RDNA 3 (2023−2025)
GPU code nameNavi 21Navi 31
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date28 October 2020 (6 years ago)19 June 2024 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$649 $3,499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

RX 6800 XT has 827% better value for money than PRO W7900 Dual Slot.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores46086144
Core clock speed1825 MHz1760 MHz
Boost clock speed2250 MHz2495 MHz
Number of transistors26,800 million57.7 billion
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt295 Watt
Texture fill rate648.0958.1
Floating-point processing power20.74 TFLOPSno data
ROPs128192
TMUs288384
Ray Tracing Cores7296
L0 Cache1.1 MB3 MB
L1 Cache1 MB3 MB
L2 Cache4 MB6 MB
L3 Cache128 MB96 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm280 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB48 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s864.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C3x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.9
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.0
Vulkan1.21.4

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 6800 XT 59.91
+90.6%
PRO W7900 Dual Slot 31.44

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6800 XT 25117
+90.6%
Samples: 8145
PRO W7900 Dual Slot 13181
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD195
+95%
100−110
1440p13870−75
−49.3%
4K92
+104%
45−50

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.33
+90.5%
34.99
1440p4.70
+90.6%
49.99
4K7.05
+90.9%
77.76
  • RX 6800 XT has 90% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 6800 XT has 91% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 6800 XT has 91% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 290−300
+99.3%
150−160
Cyberpunk 2077 150−160
+101%
75−80
Hogwarts Legacy 140−150
+97.3%
75−80
Resident Evil 4 Remake 180−190
+92.6%
95−100

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 191
+91%
100−105
Counter-Strike 2 290−300
+99.3%
150−160
Cyberpunk 2077 150−160
+101%
75−80
Far Cry 5 143
+90.7%
75−80
Fortnite 280−290
+104%
140−150
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+97.5%
120−130
Hogwarts Legacy 140−150
+97.3%
75−80
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+92.2%
90−95
Valorant 350−400
+94.4%
180−190

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 183
+92.6%
95−100
Counter-Strike 2 290−300
+99.3%
150−160
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+98.6%
140−150
Cyberpunk 2077 150−160
+101%
75−80
Dota 2 166
+95.3%
85−90
Far Cry 5 139
+98.6%
70−75
Fortnite 280−290
+104%
140−150
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+97.5%
120−130
Grand Theft Auto V 150
+100%
75−80
Hogwarts Legacy 140−150
+97.3%
75−80
Metro Exodus 152
+103%
75−80
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+92.2%
90−95
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 294
+96%
150−160
Valorant 350−400
+94.4%
180−190

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 175
+94.4%
90−95
Cyberpunk 2077 150−160
+101%
75−80
Dota 2 145
+93.3%
75−80
Far Cry 5 130
+100%
65−70
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+97.5%
120−130
Hogwarts Legacy 140−150
+97.3%
75−80
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+92.2%
90−95
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 160
+100%
80−85
Valorant 356
+97.8%
180−190

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 280−290
+104%
140−150

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+101%
90−95
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 450−500
+93.8%
240−250
Grand Theft Auto V 120
+100%
60−65
Metro Exodus 95
+111%
45−50
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+94.4%
90−95
Valorant 400−450
+96.7%
210−220

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 154
+92.5%
80−85
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+110%
40−45
Far Cry 5 131
+102%
65−70
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+100%
100−105
Hogwarts Legacy 75−80
+97.5%
40−45
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 140−150
+90.7%
75−80

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160
+101%
75−80

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+103%
40−45
Grand Theft Auto V 134
+91.4%
70−75
Hogwarts Legacy 40−45
+110%
21−24
Metro Exodus 56
+107%
27−30
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110
+100%
55−60
Valorant 300−350
+98.8%
160−170

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 103
+106%
50−55
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+103%
40−45
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+122%
18−20
Dota 2 122
+103%
60−65
Far Cry 5 95
+111%
45−50
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+100%
75−80
Hogwarts Legacy 40−45
+110%
21−24
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+92%
50−55

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80
+97.5%
40−45

This is how RX 6800 XT and PRO W7900 Dual Slot compete in popular games:

  • RX 6800 XT is 95% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6800 XT is 97% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6800 XT is 104% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 59.91 31.44
Recency 28 October 2020 19 June 2024
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 295 Watt

RX 6800 XT has a 91% higher aggregate performance score.

PRO W7900 Dual Slot, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 29% more advanced lithography process, and 2% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 6800 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6800 XT is a desktop graphics card while Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RX 6800 XT Radeon RX 6800 XT
vs
RTX 3080 GeForce RTX 3080
PRO W7900 Dual Slot Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
vs
Tesla K20Xm Tesla K20Xm
RX 6800 XT Radeon RX 6800 XT
vs
RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070
RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 6 GB 3050 Mobile Refresh 6 GB
vs
RX 6800 XT 6800 XT
RX 6800 XT AMD RX 6800 XT
vs
UHD Graphics 710 Mobile 710 Mobile
RX 6800 XT AMD RX 6800 XT
vs
Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Mobile 1000 Ada Generation Mobile
RX 6800 XT AMD RX 6800 XT
vs
RX 6800 XT AMD RX 6800 XT
vs
PRO W7900D W7900D
RTX A6000 NVIDIA RTX A6000
vs
RTX 2060 12 GB 2060 12 GB
RTX A6000 NVIDIA RTX A6000
vs
RTX A500 Mobile A500 Mobile
RTX A6000 NVIDIA RTX A6000
vs
A800 SXM4 80 GB 80 GB
RTX A6000 NVIDIA RTX A6000
vs
RTX 5000 X2 Mobile 5000 X2 Mobile
RTX A6000 NVIDIA RTX A6000
vs
Radeon 890M 890M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.3 4705 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6800 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 6800 XT or Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.