Radeon RX 8060S vs RX 6750 GRE
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon RX 6750 GRE with Radeon RX 8060S, including specs and performance data.
6750 GRE outperforms 8060S by a moderate 15% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 93 | 132 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 48.21 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 14.09 | no data |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) | RDNA 3.5 (2025−2026) |
| GPU code name | Navi 22 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 17 October 2023 (3 years ago) | 6 January 2025 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $549 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2560 | 40 |
| Boost clock speed | 2581 MHz | 2900 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 17,200 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 413.0 | no data |
| ROPs | 64 | no data |
| TMUs | 160 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | no data |
| Length | 267 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | no data |
| Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | no data |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | no data |
| Memory clock speed | 18 GB/s | no data |
| Memory bandwidth | 432.0 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
| Resizable BAR | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | no data |
| HDMI | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | no data |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | no data |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | no data |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 110−120
+6.8%
| 103 |
| 1440p | 55−60
+7.8%
| 51 |
| 4K | 40−45
+14.3%
| 35 |
Cost per frame, $
| 1080p | 4.99 | no data |
| 1440p | 9.98 | no data |
| 4K | 13.73 | no data |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 210−220 | 210−220 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 95−100 | 95−100 |
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 100−110 | 100−110 |
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 130−140 | 130−140 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 215 | 215 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| Far Cry 5 | 96 | 96 |
| Fortnite | 170−180 | 170−180 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 150−160 | 150−160 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 95−100 | 95−100 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 150−160 | 150−160 |
| Valorant | 230−240 | 230−240 |
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 130−140 | 130−140 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 109 | 109 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 270−280 | 270−280 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| Far Cry 5 | 95 | 95 |
| Fortnite | 170−180 | 170−180 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 150−160 | 150−160 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 127 | 127 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 95−100 | 95−100 |
| Metro Exodus | 95−100 | 95−100 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 150−160 | 150−160 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 140−150 | 140−150 |
| Valorant | 230−240 | 230−240 |
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 130−140 | 130−140 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| Far Cry 5 | 92 | 92 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 150−160 | 150−160 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 95−100 | 95−100 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 150−160 | 150−160 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 101 | 101 |
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 170−180 | 170−180 |
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 71 | 71 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 280−290 | 280−290 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 70 | 70 |
| Metro Exodus | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| Valorant | 270−280 | 270−280 |
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| Far Cry 5 | 95−100 | 95−100 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 75−80 | 75−80 |
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 100−110 | 100−110 |
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 36 | 36 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 76 | 76 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| Metro Exodus | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| Valorant | 240−250 | 240−250 |
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| Far Cry 5 | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 55−60 | 55−60 |
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 50−55 | 50−55 |
This is how RX 6750 GRE and RX 8060S compete in popular games:
- RX 6750 GRE is 7% faster in 1080p
- RX 6750 GRE is 8% faster in 1440p
- RX 6750 GRE is 14% faster in 4K
All in all, in popular games:
- there's a draw in 59 tests (100%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 45.18 | 39.20 |
| Recency | 17 October 2023 | 6 January 2025 |
RX 6750 GRE has a 15% higher aggregate performance score.
RX 8060S, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.
The Radeon RX 6750 GRE is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 8060S in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon RX 6750 GRE is a desktop graphics card while Radeon RX 8060S is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
