Radeon RX 7800M vs RX 6650M XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6650M XT and Radeon RX 7800M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 6650M XT
2022
8 GB GDDR6, 120 Watt
38.44

7800M outperforms 6650M XT by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking137107
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency24.9518.16
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code nameNavi 23Navi 32
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date4 January 2022 (4 years ago)11 September 2024 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20483840
Core clock speed2068 MHz1295 MHz
Boost clock speed2416 MHz2539 MHz
Number of transistors11,060 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt180 Watt
Texture fill rate309.2609.4
Floating-point processing power9.896 TFLOPSno data
ROPs6496
TMUs128240
Ray Tracing Cores3260
L0 Cache512 KB960 KB
L1 Cache512 KB768 KB
L2 Cache2 MB4 MB
L3 Cache32 MB48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.9
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.0
Vulkan1.31.4

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 6650M XT 38.44
RX 7800M 41.98
+9.2%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6650M XT 16081
Samples: 3
RX 7800M 17562
+9.2%
Samples: 56

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 110−120 120−130
+2.6%
Counter-Strike 2 210−220 230−240
+7%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95 95−100
+4.4%

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 110−120 120−130
+2.6%
Battlefield 5 130−140 140−150
+5.3%
Counter-Strike 2 210−220 230−240
+7%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95 95−100
+4.4%
Far Cry 5 120−130 130−140
+4%
Fortnite 160−170 180−190
+6.5%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160 160−170
+6.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160 160−170
+4.6%
Valorant 230−240 250−260
+7.8%

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 110−120 120−130
+2.6%
Battlefield 5 130−140 140−150
+5.3%
Counter-Strike 2 210−220 230−240
+7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 300−310
+7.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95 95−100
+4.4%
Dota 2 140−150 150−160
+4.2%
Far Cry 5 120−130 130−140
+4%
Far Cry 6 110−120 120−130
+6.2%
Fortnite 160−170 180−190
+6.5%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160 160−170
+6.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 120−130 140−150
+8.5%
Metro Exodus 90−95 100−105
+7.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160 160−170
+4.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 140−150 150−160
+7.1%
Valorant 230−240 250−260
+7.8%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140 140−150
+5.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95 95−100
+4.4%
Dota 2 140−150 150−160
+4.2%
Far Cry 5 120−130 130−140
+4%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160 160−170
+6.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160 160−170
+4.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 140−150 150−160
+7.1%
Valorant 230−240 250−260
+7.8%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 160−170 180−190
+6.5%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 95−100 100−105
+1%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 290−300
+6.2%
Far Cry 6 70−75 75−80
+2.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 80−85 85−90
+4.9%
Metro Exodus 55−60 60−65
+5.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 190−200
+8.6%
Valorant 260−270 290−300
+9%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100−105 100−105
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 45−50
Far Cry 5 95−100 100−105
+5.3%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120 120−130
+8.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80 80−85
+6.7%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 100−110 110−120
+5.8%

4K
High

Atomic Heart 30−35
+3.3%
30−33
Counter-Strike 2 45−50 50−55
+8.7%
Far Cry 6 30−35
+3.3%
30−33
Grand Theft Auto V 85−90 90−95
+4.7%
Metro Exodus 35−40 35−40
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65 65−70
+4.8%
Valorant 230−240 260−270
+8.8%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 60−65 65−70
+4.8%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50 50−55
+8.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 21−24
Dota 2 110−120 120−130
+8.1%
Far Cry 5 50−55 55−60
+5.8%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75 80−85
+8.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55 55−60
+3.8%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 50−55 55−60
+7.8%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 38.44 41.98
Recency 4 January 2022 11 September 2024
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 180 Watt

RX 6650M XT has 33% lower power consumption.

RX 7800M, on the other hand, has a 9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 29% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon RX 6650M XT and Radeon RX 7800M.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 79 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6650M XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 16 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7800M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 6650M XT or Radeon RX 7800M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.