Rubin Ultra GPU vs Radeon RX 6650 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking113not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation54.33no data
Power efficiency18.05no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)Rubin Ultra (2027)
GPU code nameNavi 23GR110
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date10 May 2022 (4 years ago)2027
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores204857344
Core clock speed2055 MHz700 MHz
Boost clock speed2635 MHz2267 MHz
Number of transistors11,060 million670,000 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)176 Watt3600 Watt
Texture fill rate337.34,062.5
Floating-point processing power10.79 TFLOPS260 TFLOPS
ROPs6424
TMUs1281792
Tensor Coresno data1792
Ray Tracing Cores32no data
L0 Cache512 KBno data
L1 Cache512 KB112 MB
L2 Cache2 MB128 MB
L3 Cache32 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 6.0 x16
Width2-slotSXM Module
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM4e
Maximum RAM amount8 GB1024 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit32768 Bit
Memory clock speed2190 MHz1900 MHz
Memory bandwidth280.3 GB/s31.1 TB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4aNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)N/A
Shader Model6.5N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA-10.7
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 1024 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 176 Watt 3600 Watt

RX 6650 XT has 1945% lower power consumption.

Rubin Ultra GPU, on the other hand, has a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 6650 XT and Rubin Ultra GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6650 XT is a desktop graphics card while Rubin Ultra GPU is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 4229 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6650 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Rubin Ultra GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 6650 XT or Rubin Ultra GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.