GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon RX 6600M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6600M with GeForce RTX 4060 Ti, including specs and performance data.

RX 6600M
2021
8 GB GDDR6, 100 Watt
32.87
RTX 4060 Ti
2023, $399
8 GB GDDR6, 160 Watt
54.00
+64.3%

RTX 4060 Ti outperforms 6600M by an impressive 64% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking18358
Place by popularitynot in top-10049
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data78.63
Power efficiency25.6026.29
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 23AD106
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date31 May 2021 (5 years ago)18 May 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17924352
Core clock speed2068 MHz2310 MHz
Boost clock speed2416 MHz2535 MHz
Number of transistors11,060 million22,900 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt160 Watt
Texture fill rate270.6344.8
Floating-point processing power8.659 TFLOPS22.06 TFLOPS
ROPs6448
TMUs112136
Tensor Coresno data136
Ray Tracing Cores2834
L0 Cache448 KBno data
L1 Cache512 KB4.3 MB
L2 Cache2 MB32 MB
L3 Cache32 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data240 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 6600M 32.87
RTX 4060 Ti 54.00
+64.3%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6600M 13753
Samples: 1057
RTX 4060 Ti 22592
+64.3%
Samples: 15989

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD100160−170
+60%
1440p5485−90
+57.4%
4K3045−50
+50%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.49
1440pno data4.69
4Kno data8.87

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 180−190 300−310
+60.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 107 170−180
+58.9%
Hogwarts Legacy 100 160−170
+60%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 115 180−190
+56.5%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 120−130 190−200
+57%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190 300−310
+60.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 83 130−140
+56.6%
Far Cry 5 116 190−200
+63.8%
Fortnite 150−160 240−250
+60%
Forza Horizon 4 202 300−310
+48.5%
Hogwarts Legacy 86 140−150
+62.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140 220−230
+64.2%
Valorant 200−210 300−310
+44.9%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 120−130 190−200
+57%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190 300−310
+60.4%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 450−500
+62.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 69 110−120
+59.4%
Dota 2 114 180−190
+57.9%
Far Cry 5 108 170−180
+57.4%
Fortnite 150−160 240−250
+60%
Forza Horizon 4 199 300−310
+50.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 116 190−200
+63.8%
Hogwarts Legacy 68 110−120
+61.8%
Metro Exodus 80 130−140
+62.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140 220−230
+64.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 142 230−240
+62%
Valorant 200−210 300−310
+44.9%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 120−130 190−200
+57%
Cyberpunk 2077 61 100−105
+63.9%
Dota 2 104 170−180
+63.5%
Far Cry 5 101 160−170
+58.4%
Forza Horizon 4 168 270−280
+60.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 52 85−90
+63.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140 220−230
+64.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85 130−140
+52.9%
Valorant 144 230−240
+59.7%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 150−160 240−250
+60%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 80−85 130−140
+62.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240 350−400
+49.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 61 100−105
+63.9%
Metro Exodus 47 75−80
+59.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 280−290
+60%
Valorant 240−250 350−400
+45.8%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 85−90 140−150
+59.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 39 60−65
+53.8%
Far Cry 5 90 140−150
+55.6%
Forza Horizon 4 128 210−220
+64.1%
Hogwarts Legacy 36 55−60
+52.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 62 100−105
+61.3%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 85−90 140−150
+62.8%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 35−40 60−65
+62.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 58 95−100
+63.8%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24 30−33
+42.9%
Metro Exodus 28 45−50
+60.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 44 70−75
+59.1%
Valorant 200−210 300−310
+48.5%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 50−55 85−90
+60.4%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40 60−65
+62.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 19 30−33
+57.9%
Dota 2 80 130−140
+62.5%
Far Cry 5 44 70−75
+59.1%
Forza Horizon 4 74 120−130
+62.2%
Hogwarts Legacy 19 30−33
+57.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45 65−70
+58.5%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 40−45 65−70
+58.5%

This is how RX 6600M and RTX 4060 Ti compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4060 Ti is 60% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4060 Ti is 57% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4060 Ti is 50% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 32.87 54.00
Recency 31 May 2021 18 May 2023
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 160 Watt

RX 6600M has 38% lower power consumption.

RTX 4060 Ti, on the other hand, has a 64% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 29% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 6600M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6600M is a notebook graphics card while GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1132 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 13254 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4060 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 6600M or GeForce RTX 4060 Ti, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.