RTX A4500 vs Radeon RX 6600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6600 with RTX A4500, including specs and performance data.

RX 6600
2021, $329
8 GB GDDR6, 132 Watt
35.95

RTX A4500 outperforms RX 6600 by a substantial 37% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking15871
Place by popularity22not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation49.70no data
Power efficiency21.2119.18
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameNavi 23GA102
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date13 October 2021 (4 years ago)23 November 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17927168
Core clock speed1626 MHz1050 MHz
Boost clock speed2491 MHz1650 MHz
Number of transistors11,060 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)132 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate279.0369.6
Floating-point processing power8.928 TFLOPS23.65 TFLOPS
ROPs6496
TMUs112224
Tensor Coresno data224
Ray Tracing Cores2856
L0 Cache448 KBno data
L1 Cache512 KB7 MB
L2 Cache2 MB6 MB
L3 Cache32 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Length190 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB20 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s640.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort4x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 6600 35.95
RTX A4500 49.26
+37%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6600 15039
Samples: 15867
RTX A4500 20610
+37%
Samples: 604

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD103140−150
+35.9%
1440p5370−75
+32.1%
4K3040−45
+33.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.19no data
1440p6.21no data
4K10.97no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 169 230−240
+36.1%
Counter-Strike 2 345 450−500
+30.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 107 140−150
+30.8%

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 120 160−170
+33.3%
Battlefield 5 120−130 170−180
+32.8%
Counter-Strike 2 303 400−450
+32%
Cyberpunk 2077 91 120−130
+31.9%
Far Cry 5 154 210−220
+36.4%
Fortnite 160−170 210−220
+31.3%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150 190−200
+34.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150 190−200
+31%
Valorant 220−230 300−310
+35.7%

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 70 95−100
+35.7%
Battlefield 5 120−130 170−180
+32.8%
Counter-Strike 2 146 200−210
+37%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 350−400
+25.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 73 100−105
+37%
Dota 2 150 200−210
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 142 190−200
+33.8%
Far Cry 6 121 160−170
+32.2%
Fortnite 160−170 210−220
+31.3%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150 190−200
+34.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 137 180−190
+31.4%
Metro Exodus 82 110−120
+34.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150 190−200
+31%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 147 200−210
+36.1%
Valorant 220−230 300−310
+35.7%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 120−130 170−180
+32.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 59 80−85
+35.6%
Dota 2 107 140−150
+30.8%
Far Cry 5 134 180−190
+34.3%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150 190−200
+34.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150 190−200
+31%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90 120−130
+33.3%
Valorant 220−230 300−310
+35.7%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 160−170 210−220
+31.3%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 85 110−120
+29.4%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260 300−310
+17.6%
Far Cry 6 59 80−85
+35.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 64 85−90
+32.8%
Metro Exodus 48 65−70
+35.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 230−240
+31.4%
Valorant 250−260 300−310
+18.1%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 95−100 130−140
+36.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 34 45−50
+32.4%
Far Cry 5 91 120−130
+31.9%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110 130−140
+27.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70 90−95
+32.4%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 95−100 130−140
+35.4%

4K
High

Atomic Heart 27−30 35−40
+20.7%
Counter-Strike 2 20 27−30
+35%
Far Cry 6 10 12−14
+20%
Grand Theft Auto V 60 80−85
+33.3%
Metro Exodus 29 35−40
+20.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 44 60−65
+36.4%
Valorant 220−230 300−310
+34.5%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60 75−80
+29.3%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45 55−60
+31%
Cyberpunk 2077 14 18−20
+28.6%
Dota 2 85 110−120
+29.4%
Far Cry 5 44 60−65
+36.4%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70 90−95
+32.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50 60−65
+27.7%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 45−50 60−65
+27.7%

This is how RX 6600 and RTX A4500 compete in popular games:

  • RTX A4500 is 36% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A4500 is 32% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A4500 is 33% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 35.95 49.26
Recency 13 October 2021 23 November 2021
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 20 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 132 Watt 200 Watt

RX 6600 has a 13% more advanced lithography process, and 34% lower power consumption.

RTX A4500, on the other hand, has a 37% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 month, and a 150% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The RTX A4500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 6600 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6600 is a desktop graphics card while RTX A4500 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 13568 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 218 votes

Rate RTX A4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 6600 or RTX A4500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.