RTX A1000 Mobile vs Radeon RX 6500
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon RX 6500 with RTX A1000 Mobile, including specs and performance data.
RTX A1000 Mobile outperforms RX 6500 by a significant 22% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 342 | 289 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 29.13 |
| Architecture | no data | Ampere (2020−2025) |
| GPU code name | no data | GA107 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | no data | 30 March 2022 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | no data | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | no data | 630 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1140 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | no data | 8 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 60 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 72.96 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 4.669 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 32 |
| TMUs | no data | 64 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 64 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 16 |
| L1 Cache | no data | 2 MB |
| L2 Cache | no data | 2 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | no data | medium sized |
| Interface | no data | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | no data | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 1375 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 176.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | no data | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | Portable Device Dependent |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | no data | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.7 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.3 |
| CUDA | - | 8.6 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 55−60 | 67
+21.8%
|
| 1440p | 21−24 | 27
+28.6%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 75−80 | 90−95
+16.5%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 60−65 | 85
+37.1%
|
| Fortnite | 100−105 | 110−120
+15%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 75−80 | 90−95
+19.5%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 70−75 | 90−95
+25%
|
| Valorant | 140−150 | 160−170
+14.3%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 75−80 | 90−95
+16.5%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 220−230 | 250−260
+10.5%
|
| Dota 2 | 100−110 | 112
+3.7%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 60−65 | 79
+27.4%
|
| Fortnite | 100−105 | 110−120
+15%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 75−80 | 90−95
+19.5%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 70−75 | 91
+30%
|
| Metro Exodus | 40−45 | 41
+2.5%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 70−75 | 90−95
+25%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 50−55 | 85
+63.5%
|
| Valorant | 140−150 | 160−170
+14.3%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 75−80 | 90−95
+16.5%
|
| Dota 2 | 100−110 | 132
+22.2%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 60−65 | 73
+17.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 75−80 | 90−95
+19.5%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 70−75 | 90−95
+25%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 50−55
+20.9%
|
43 |
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 100−105 | 110−120
+15%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 130−140 | 160−170
+19.7%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 30−35 | 40−45
+31.3%
|
| Metro Exodus | 24−27 | 24 |
| Valorant | 160−170 | 180−190
+14.7%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 50−55 | 60−65
+18.5%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 40−45 | 50−55
+23.8%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 45−50 | 55−60
+25.5%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 40−45 | 55−60
+25%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 30−35 | 40−45
+26.5%
|
| Metro Exodus | 14−16 | 18−20
+26.7%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 27−30 | 30−35
+25.9%
|
| Valorant | 95−100 | 120−130
+28.6%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 27−30 | 35−40
+25%
|
| Dota 2 | 65−70 | 75−80
+16.9%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 21−24 | 27−30
+28.6%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 30−35 | 40−45
+21.2%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 18−20 | 24−27
+26.3%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 18−20 | 24−27
+31.6%
|
Full HD
Low
| Atomic Heart | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 61 | 61 |
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 50−55 | 50−55 |
Full HD
Medium
| Atomic Heart | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 50 | 50 |
Full HD
High
| Atomic Heart | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 37 | 37 |
Full HD
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 29 | 29 |
| Valorant | 160−170 | 160−170 |
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180 | 170−180 |
1440p
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 35−40 | 35−40 |
4K
High
| Atomic Heart | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 21−24 | 21−24 |
4K
Ultra
| Counter-Strike 2 | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−11 | 10−11 |
This is how RX 6500 and RTX A1000 Mobile compete in popular games:
- RTX A1000 Mobile is 22% faster in 1080p
- RTX A1000 Mobile is 29% faster in 1440p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6500 is 21% faster.
- in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX A1000 Mobile is 63% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- RX 6500 performs better in 1 test (2%)
- RTX A1000 Mobile performs better in 40 tests (65%)
- there's a draw in 21 tests (34%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 18.44 | 22.45 |
RTX A1000 Mobile has a 22% higher aggregate performance score.
The RTX A1000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 6500 in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon RX 6500 is a notebook graphics card while RTX A1000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
