GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER vs Radeon RX 6400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6400 and GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 6400
2022, $159
4 GB GDDR6, 53 Watt
18.49
RTX 4080 SUPER
2024, $999
16 GB GDDR6X, 320 Watt
81.61
+341%

RTX 4080 SUPER outperforms RX 6400 by a whopping 341% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking3428
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation38.2946.32
Power efficiency27.2019.88
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 24AD103
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date19 January 2022 (4 years ago)8 January 2024 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$159 $999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

RTX 4080 SUPER has 21% better value for money than RX 6400.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores76810240
Core clock speed1923 MHz2295 MHz
Boost clock speed2321 MHz2550 MHz
Number of transistors5,400 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)53 Watt320 Watt
Texture fill rate111.4816.0
Floating-point processing power3.565 TFLOPS52.22 TFLOPS
ROPs32112
TMUs48320
Tensor Coresno data320
Ray Tracing Cores1280
L0 Cache192 KBno data
L1 Cache256 KB10 MB
L2 Cache1024 KB64 MB
L3 Cache16 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data310 mm
Width1-slot3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1438 MHz
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/s736.3 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI++

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 6400 18.49
RTX 4080 SUPER 81.61
+341%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6400 7753
Samples: 2319
RTX 4080 SUPER 34212
+341%
Samples: 10655

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD55−60
−78.6%
257
1440p40−45
−77.5%
178
4K24−27
−79.3%
116

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.89
+25.6%
3.89
1440p3.98
+29.2%
5.61
4K6.63
+23.1%
8.61
  • RX 6400 has 26% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 6400 has 29% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 6400 has 23% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 351 351
Cyberpunk 2077 249 249
Hogwarts Legacy 205 205
Resident Evil 4 Remake 347 347

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 190−200 190−200
Counter-Strike 2 344 344
Cyberpunk 2077 246 246
Far Cry 5 240 240
Fortnite 300−350 300−350
Forza Horizon 4 344 344
Hogwarts Legacy 185 185
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 550−600 550−600

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 190−200 190−200
Counter-Strike 2 339 339
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 270−280
Cyberpunk 2077 238 238
Far Cry 5 227 227
Fortnite 300−350 300−350
Forza Horizon 4 342 342
Grand Theft Auto V 179 179
Hogwarts Legacy 166 166
Metro Exodus 227 227
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 547 547
Valorant 550−600 550−600

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 190−200 190−200
Cyberpunk 2077 199 199
Far Cry 5 212 212
Forza Horizon 4 322 322
Hogwarts Legacy 154 154
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 263 263
Valorant 550−600 550−600

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 300−350 300−350

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 274 274
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 500−550 500−550
Grand Theft Auto V 169 169
Metro Exodus 162 162
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 450−500 450−500

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 190−200 190−200
Cyberpunk 2077 128 128
Far Cry 5 208 208
Forza Horizon 4 306 306
Hogwarts Legacy 111 111
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 221 221

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160 150−160

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 134 134
Grand Theft Auto V 187 187
Hogwarts Legacy 75−80 75−80
Metro Exodus 106 106
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 204 204
Valorant 300−350 300−350

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140 130−140
Counter-Strike 2 120−130 120−130
Cyberpunk 2077 61 61
Far Cry 5 145 145
Forza Horizon 4 305 305
Hogwarts Legacy 68 68
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100 95−100

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80 75−80

This is how RX 6400 and RTX 4080 SUPER compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4080 SUPER is 367% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4080 SUPER is 345% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4080 SUPER is 383% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 62 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.49 81.61
Recency 19 January 2022 8 January 2024
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 53 Watt 320 Watt

RX 6400 has 83% lower power consumption.

RTX 4080 SUPER, on the other hand, has a 341% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 17% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 6400 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 2530 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 3664 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 6400 or GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.