Rubin Ultra GPU vs Radeon RX 640

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking672not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.40no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Rubin Ultra (2027)
GPU code namePolaris 23GR110
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date13 May 2019 (7 years ago)2027

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64057344
Core clock speed1082 MHz700 MHz
Boost clock speed1218 MHz2267 MHz
Number of transistors2,200 million670,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt3600 Watt
Texture fill rate48.724,062.5
Floating-point processing power1.559 TFLOPS260 TFLOPS
ROPs1624
TMUs401792
Tensor Coresno data1792
L1 Cache160 KB112 MB
L2 Cache512 KB128 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 6.0 x16
Widthno dataSXM Module
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM4e
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1024 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit32768 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1900 MHz
Memory bandwidth48 GB/s31.1 TB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)N/A
Shader Model6.4N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-10.7
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1024 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 3600 Watt

RX 640 has 7100% lower power consumption.

Rubin Ultra GPU, on the other hand, has a 51100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 367% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 640 and Rubin Ultra GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 640 is a notebook graphics card while Rubin Ultra GPU is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 283 votes

Rate Radeon RX 640 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Rubin Ultra GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 640 or Rubin Ultra GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.