Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU vs Radeon RX 6300M

Place in the ranking	444	475
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	27.81	no data
Architecture	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)	no data
GPU code name	Navi 24	Panther Lake
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	4 January 2022 (4 years ago)	5 January 2026 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	32
Core clock speed	2000 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	2400 MHz	2450 MHz
Number of transistors	5,400 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	no data
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	115.2	no data
Floating-point processing power	3.686 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	32	no data
TMUs	48	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	12	no data
L0 Cache	192 KB	no data
L1 Cache	256 KB	no data
L2 Cache	1024 KB	4 MB
L3 Cache	8 MB	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x4	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	no data
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	no data
Memory bus width	32 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	2250 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	72 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+
Resizable BAR	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	no data
Shader Model	6.6	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	2.2	no data
Vulkan	1.3	-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

35−40
+12.9%

−12.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2	70−75 −12.9%	79 +12.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 +13%	21−24 −13%
Palworld	30−33 +15.4%	24−27 −15.4%
Resident Evil 4 Remake	24−27 +18.2%	21−24 −18.2%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5	55−60 +14.3%	45−50 −14.3%
Counter-Strike 2	70−75 +18.6%	59 −18.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 +13%	21−24 −13%
Far Cry 5	40−45 +16.7%	35−40 −16.7%
Fortnite	70−75 +12.1%	65−70 −12.1%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +12.5%	45−50 −12.5%
Palworld	30−33 +15.4%	24−27 −15.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	45−50 +15%	40−45 −15%
Valorant	110−120 +8.9%	100−110 −8.9%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5	55−60 +14.3%	45−50 −14.3%
Counter-Strike 2	70−75 +159%	27 −159%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	170−180 +9.9%	160−170 −9.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 +13%	21−24 −13%
Dota 2	85−90 +21.4%	70−75 −21.4%
Far Cry 5	40−45 +16.7%	35−40 −16.7%
Fortnite	70−75 +12.1%	65−70 −12.1%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +12.5%	45−50 −12.5%
Grand Theft Auto V	45−50 +29.7%	37 −29.7%
Metro Exodus	24−27 +13%	21−24 −13%
Palworld	30−33 +15.4%	24−27 −15.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	45−50 +15%	40−45 −15%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 +13.8%	27−30 −13.8%
Valorant	110−120 +8.9%	100−110 −8.9%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5	55−60 +14.3%	45−50 −14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 +13%	21−24 −13%
Dota 2	85−90 +21.4%	70−75 −21.4%
Far Cry 5	40−45 +16.7%	35−40 −16.7%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +12.5%	45−50 −12.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	45−50 +15%	40−45 −15%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 +13.8%	27−30 −13.8%
Valorant	110−120 +15.8%	95−100 −15.8%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite	70−75 +12.1%	65−70 −12.1%
Palworld	30−33 +15.4%	24−27 −15.4%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2	24−27 +14.3%	21−24 −14.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	95−100 +13.1%	80−85 −13.1%
Grand Theft Auto V	18−20 +18.8%	16−18 −18.8%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +15.4%	12−14 −15.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	85−90 +21.4%	70−75 −21.4%
Valorant	120−130 +11.7%	110−120 −11.7%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5	35−40 +20.7%	27−30 −20.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 +22.2%	9−10 −22.2%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +12.5%	24−27 −12.5%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 +14.8%	27−30 −14.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 +20%	14−16 −20%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite	27−30 +16.7%	24−27 −16.7%
Palworld	16−18 +13.3%	14−16 −13.3%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%
Grand Theft Auto V	24−27 +9.1%	21−24 −9.1%
Metro Exodus	9−10 +28.6%	7−8 −28.6%
Palworld	9−10 +28.6%	7−8 −28.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 +21.4%	14−16 −21.4%
Valorant	60−65 +17.6%	50−55 −17.6%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5	18−20 +20%	14−16 −20%
Counter-Strike 2	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Dota 2	45−50 +15%	40−45 −15%
Far Cry 5	12−14 +18.2%	10−12 −18.2%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 +15.8%	18−20 −15.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	12−14 +9.1%	10−12 −9.1%

4K
Epic

Fortnite	12−14 +9.1%	10−12 −9.1%
Palworld	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%

This is how RX 6300M and Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU compete in popular games:

RX 6300M is 13% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 6300M is 159% faster.
in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU is 13% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RX 6300M performs better in 56 tests (97%)
Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU performs better in 1 test (2%)
there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	12.58	11.03
Recency	4 January 2022	5 January 2026

RX 6300M has a 14% higher aggregate performance score.

Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years.

The Radeon RX 6300M is our recommended choice as it beats the Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Radeon RX 6300M

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)

Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU

SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

Radeon RX 6300M

Arc Graphics 140V

RX 6650M XT

RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded

Iris Xe Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake)

RTX 5880 Ada Generation

RX 6850 XT

Playstation Vita GPU

Iris Xe Graphics 96EU

H100 SXM5 64 GB

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.5 16 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

4 4 votes

Rate Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 6300M or Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.