Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB vs RX 590

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
550 550 512SP 550 640SP 550X 560 560 896SP 560 XT 560D 560DX 560X 570 570 X2 570G 570X 580 580 2048SP 580 OEM 580 XTR 580G 580X 590 590 GME
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
6700 6700 XT 6750 GRE 6750 GRE 10 GB 6750 GRE 12 GB 6750 XT

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 590 and Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 590
2018, $279
8 GB GDDR5, 175 Watt
22.17
RX 6750 GRE 12 GB
2023, $334
12 GB GDDR6, 250 Watt
48.78
+120%

6750 GRE 12 GB outperforms RX 590 by a whopping 120% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RX 590 RX 590
RX 6750 GRE 12 GB RX 6750 GRE 12 GB

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking29073
Place by popularity94not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation13.8688.38
Power efficiency9.8715.20
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code namePolaris 30Navi 22
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date15 November 2018 (7 years ago)17 October 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$279 $334

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

RX 6750 GRE 12 GB has 538% better value for money than RX 590.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23042560
Core clock speed1469 MHz2321 MHz
Boost clock speed1545 MHz2581 MHz
Number of transistors5,700 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)175 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate222.5413.0
Floating-point processing power7.119 TFLOPS13.21 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs144160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40
L0 Cacheno data640 KB
L1 Cache576 KB512 KB
L2 Cache2 MB3 MB
L3 Cacheno data96 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length241 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI++

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 590 22.17
RX 6750 GRE 12 GB 48.78
+120%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 590 9275
Samples: 4378
RX 6750 GRE 12 GB 20410
+120%
Samples: 28

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD102220−230
+116%
1440p60
−53.8%
130−140
4K3880−85
+111%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.741.52
+44.5%
1440p4.652.57
+44.7%
4K7.344.18
+43.1%
  • RX 6750 GRE 12 GB has 44% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 6750 GRE 12 GB has 45% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 6750 GRE 12 GB has 43% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 60−65 130−140
+110%
Counter-Strike 2 120−130 280−290
+119%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 100−105
+104%

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 60−65 130−140
+110%
Battlefield 5 133 290−300
+118%
Counter-Strike 2 120−130 280−290
+119%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 100−105
+104%
Far Cry 5 85 180−190
+112%
Fortnite 139 300−310
+116%
Forza Horizon 4 120 260−270
+117%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120 260−270
+117%
Valorant 301 650−700
+116%

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 60−65 130−140
+110%
Battlefield 5 111 240−250
+116%
Counter-Strike 2 120−130 280−290
+119%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260 550−600
+120%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 100−105
+104%
Dota 2 110−120 260−270
+118%
Far Cry 5 79 170−180
+115%
Far Cry 6 60−65 140−150
+119%
Fortnite 138 300−310
+117%
Forza Horizon 4 113 240−250
+112%
Grand Theft Auto V 79 170−180
+115%
Metro Exodus 52 110−120
+112%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 108 230−240
+113%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 88 190−200
+116%
Valorant 287 600−650
+109%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100 220−230
+120%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 100−105
+104%
Dota 2 110−120 260−270
+118%
Far Cry 5 74 160−170
+116%
Forza Horizon 4 91 200−210
+120%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 83 180−190
+117%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51 110−120
+116%
Valorant 110 240−250
+118%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 96 210−220
+119%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 45−50 100−105
+108%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170 350−400
+116%
Far Cry 6 35−40 80−85
+116%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45 90−95
+120%
Metro Exodus 31 65−70
+110%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 350−400
+101%
Valorant 232 500−550
+116%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 60−65 140−150
+119%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 45−50
+105%
Far Cry 5 50−55 110−120
+112%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60 120−130
+107%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40 75−80
+108%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 50−55 110−120
+104%

4K
High

Atomic Heart 18−20 35−40
+94.4%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24 45−50
+105%
Far Cry 6 12−14 24−27
+100%
Grand Theft Auto V 41 90−95
+120%
Metro Exodus 19 40−45
+111%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 32 70−75
+119%
Valorant 113 240−250
+112%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40 85−90
+113%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24 45−50
+105%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 18−20
+100%
Dota 2 75−80 160−170
+111%
Far Cry 5 24 50−55
+108%
Forza Horizon 4 46 100−105
+117%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35 75−80
+114%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 29 60−65
+107%

This is how RX 590 and RX 6750 GRE 12 GB compete in popular games:

  • RX 6750 GRE 12 GB is 116% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6750 GRE 12 GB is 117% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6750 GRE 12 GB is 111% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 22.17 48.78
Recency 15 November 2018 17 October 2023
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 175 Watt 250 Watt

RX 590 has 30% lower power consumption.

RX 6750 GRE 12 GB, on the other hand, has a 120% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 590 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RX 590 Radeon RX 590
vs
GTX 1060 5 GB GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
RX 6750 GRE 12 GB Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB
vs
RTX 3060 Ti GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
RX 590 Radeon RX 590
vs
R9 390X Radeon R9 390X
9600M GT GeForce 9600M GT
vs
ATI HD 3650 Radeon HD 3650
8600 GT GeForce 8600 GT
vs
7900 GT GeForce 7900 GT
UHD Graphics UHD Graphics
vs
7900 GT GeForce 7900 GT
RTX 3050 4GB Mobile GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
vs
TITAN V TITAN V
RTX 2050 Mobile GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
vs
R7 350 Radeon R7 350
GTX 970M GTX 970M
vs
GTX 1660 Super GTX 1660 Super
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
vs
GTX 1650 SUPER GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
RTX 4090 GeForce RTX 4090
vs
A100 SXM4 A100 SXM4
Radeon 780M Radeon 780M
vs
Tegra X2 GPU Tegra X2 GPU
HD Graphics 2500 HD Graphics 2500
vs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.1 3084 votes

Rate Radeon RX 590 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 245 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 590 or Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.