Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs Radeon RX 570X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 570X with Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), including specs and performance data.

RX 570X
2018
8 GB GDDR5, 120 Watt
4.62
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
2019
12 Watt
5.00
+8.2%

Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) outperforms 570X by a small 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking706688
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.9815.47
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code namePolaris 20Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date11 April 2018 (8 years ago)28 May 2019 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores204864
Core clock speed1168 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1244 MHz1100 MHz
Number of transistors5,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt12-25 Watt
Texture fill rate159.2no data
Floating-point processing power5.095 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs128no data
L1 Cache512 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length241 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR4
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1750 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortno data
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12_1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD16−18
−12.5%
18
+12.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 32
+0%
32
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Palworld 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 18
+0%
18
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 28
+0%
28
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 12
+0%
12
+0%
Fortnite 32
+0%
32
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 13
+0%
13
+0%
Palworld 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 16
+0%
16
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 6
+0%
6
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 39
+0%
39
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Dota 2 30
+0%
30
+0%
Far Cry 5 10
+0%
10
+0%
Fortnite 25
+0%
25
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 9
+0%
9
+0%
Metro Exodus 5
+0%
5
+0%
Palworld 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18
+0%
18
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Dota 2 28
+0%
28
+0%
Far Cry 5 11
+0%
11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9
+0%
9
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 15
+0%
15
+0%
Palworld 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Palworld 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Palworld 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Valorant 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Palworld 0−1 0−1

This is how RX 570X and Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) compete in popular games:

  • Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is 13% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 60 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.62 5.00
Recency 11 April 2018 28 May 2019
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 12 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) has a 8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 900% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon RX 570X and Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU).

Be aware that Radeon RX 570X is a desktop graphics card while Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 46 votes

Rate Radeon RX 570X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 243 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 570X or Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.