Radeon Pro W6800X Duo vs RX 5700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 5700 with Radeon Pro W6800X Duo, including specs and performance data.

RX 5700
2019, $349
8 GB GDDR6, 180 Watt
33.95
Pro W6800X Duo
2021, $4,999
32 GB GDDR6, 400 Watt
35.24
+3.8%

Pro W6800X Duo outperforms RX 5700 by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking171164
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation29.452.86
Power efficiency14.696.86
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameNavi 10Navi 21
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date7 July 2019 (7 years ago)3 August 2021 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$349 $4,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

RX 5700 has 930% better value for money than Pro W6800X Duo.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23043840 ×2
Core clock speed1465 MHz1800 MHz
Boost clock speed1725 MHz1967 MHz
Number of transistors10,300 million26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt400 Watt
Texture fill rate248.4472.1 ×2
Floating-point processing power7.949 TFLOPS15.11 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs6496 ×2
TMUs144240 ×2
Ray Tracing Coresno data60 ×2
L0 Cacheno data960 KB
L1 Cacheno data768 KB
L2 Cache4 MB4 MB
L3 Cacheno data128 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16Apple MPX
Length268 mm267 mm
Width2-slotQuad-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB32 GB ×2
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s512.0 GB/s ×2
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.0b, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a1x HDMI 2.1, 4x Thunderbolt
HDMI++

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan1.41.3

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 5700 33.95
Pro W6800X Duo 35.24
+3.8%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 5700 14205
Samples: 3456
Pro W6800X Duo 14742
+3.8%
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD114
+3.6%
110−120
1440p6970−75
+1.4%
4K43
+7.5%
40−45

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.06
+93.3%
45.45
1440p5.06
+92.9%
71.41
4K8.12
+93.5%
124.98
  • RX 5700 has 93% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 5700 has 93% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 5700 has 94% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 159 160−170
+0.6%
Counter-Strike 2 344 350−400
+1.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 84 85−90
+1.2%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 131
+0.8%
130−140

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 121
+0.8%
120−130
Battlefield 5 115
+4.5%
110−120
Counter-Strike 2 307
+2.3%
300−310
Cyberpunk 2077 75 75−80
Far Cry 5 156 160−170
+2.6%
Fortnite 166 170−180
+2.4%
Forza Horizon 4 132
+1.5%
130−140
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 151
+0.7%
150−160
Valorant 294 300−310
+2%

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 70 70−75
Battlefield 5 105
+5%
100−105
Counter-Strike 2 154
+2.7%
150−160
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 280−290
+0.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 67
+3.1%
65−70
Dota 2 156 160−170
+2.6%
Far Cry 5 144
+2.9%
140−150
Fortnite 140 140−150
Forza Horizon 4 130 130−140
Grand Theft Auto V 137 140−150
+2.2%
Metro Exodus 87 90−95
+3.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 144
+2.9%
140−150
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 147 150−160
+2%
Valorant 291 300−310
+3.1%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 97 100−105
+3.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 58 60−65
+3.4%
Dota 2 146 150−160
+2.7%
Far Cry 5 135 140−150
+3.7%
Forza Horizon 4 118 120−130
+1.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 139 140−150
+0.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 91
+1.1%
90−95
Valorant 160 160−170

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 118 120−130
+1.7%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 87 90−95
+3.4%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 240−250 250−260
+3.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 72
+2.9%
70−75
Metro Exodus 51
+2%
50−55
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 180−190
+2.9%
Valorant 277 280−290
+1.1%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 81
+1.3%
80−85
Cyberpunk 2077 36
+2.9%
35−40
Far Cry 5 93 95−100
+2.2%
Forza Horizon 4 103
+3%
100−105
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65 65−70
+3.2%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 77
+2.7%
75−80

4K
High

Atomic Heart 27−30
+3.7%
27−30
Counter-Strike 2 25
+4.2%
24−27
Grand Theft Auto V 72
+2.9%
70−75
Metro Exodus 31
+3.3%
30−33
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 48
+6.7%
45−50
Valorant 231
+0.4%
230−240

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 54 55−60
+1.9%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40 40−45
+2.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 15
+7.1%
14−16
Dota 2 100 100−105
Far Cry 5 47
+4.4%
45−50
Forza Horizon 4 70 70−75
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 59 60−65
+1.7%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 39 40−45
+2.6%

This is how RX 5700 and Pro W6800X Duo compete in popular games:

  • RX 5700 is 4% faster in 1080p
  • Pro W6800X Duo is 1% faster in 1440p
  • RX 5700 is 8% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 33.95 35.24
Recency 7 July 2019 3 August 2021
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 32 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 400 Watt

RX 5700 has 55% lower power consumption.

Pro W6800X Duo, on the other hand, has a 4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon RX 5700 and Radeon Pro W6800X Duo.

Be aware that Radeon RX 5700 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro W6800X Duo is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 2432 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 41 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6800X Duo on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 5700 or Radeon Pro W6800X Duo, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.