GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 vs Radeon RX 5700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 5700 and GeForce RTX 5090 D V2, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 5700
2019, $349
8 GB GDDR6, 180 Watt
33.85
RTX 5090 D V2
2025, $2,299
24 GB GDDR7, 575 Watt
84.06
+148%

RTX 5090 D V2 outperforms RX 5700 by a whopping 148% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1776
Place by popularity99not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation28.2718.79
Power efficiency14.6811.41
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameNavi 10GB202
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date7 July 2019 (7 years ago)15 August 2025 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$349 $2,299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

RX 5700 has 50% better value for money than RTX 5090 D V2.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores230421760
Core clock speed1465 MHz2017 MHz
Boost clock speed1725 MHz2407 MHz
Number of transistors10,300 million92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt575 Watt
Texture fill rate248.41,636.8
Floating-point processing power7.949 TFLOPS104.8 TFLOPS
ROPs64176
TMUs144680
Tensor Coresno data680
Ray Tracing Coresno data170
L1 Cacheno data21.3 MB
L2 Cache4 MB96 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length268 mm304 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount8 GB24 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s1.34 TB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.0b, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
HDMI++

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.41.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 5700 33.85
RTX 5090 D V2 84.06
+148%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 5700 14189
Samples: 3512
RTX 5090 D V2 35239
+148%
Samples: 21

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD114280−290
+146%
1440p69
−59.4%
170−180
4K43
−57%
100−110

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.06
+62.7%
8.21
1440p5.06
+62.6%
13.52
4K8.12
+64.7%
22.99
  • RX 5700 has 63% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 5700 has 63% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 5700 has 65% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 344 850−900
+147%
Cyberpunk 2077 84 200−210
+138%
Hogwarts Legacy 115 280−290
+143%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 131 300−310
+129%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 115 280−290
+143%
Counter-Strike 2 307 750−800
+144%
Cyberpunk 2077 75 180−190
+140%
Far Cry 5 156 350−400
+124%
Fortnite 166 400−450
+141%
Forza Horizon 4 132 300−310
+127%
Hogwarts Legacy 86 210−220
+144%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 151 350−400
+132%
Valorant 294 700−750
+138%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 105 260−270
+148%
Counter-Strike 2 154 350−400
+127%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 650−700
+134%
Cyberpunk 2077 67 160−170
+139%
Dota 2 156 350−400
+124%
Far Cry 5 144 350−400
+143%
Fortnite 140 300−310
+114%
Forza Horizon 4 130 300−310
+131%
Grand Theft Auto V 137 300−310
+119%
Hogwarts Legacy 68 160−170
+135%
Metro Exodus 87 210−220
+141%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 144 350−400
+143%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 147 350−400
+138%
Valorant 291 700−750
+141%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 97 240−250
+147%
Cyberpunk 2077 58 140−150
+141%
Dota 2 146 350−400
+140%
Far Cry 5 135 300−310
+122%
Forza Horizon 4 118 290−300
+146%
Hogwarts Legacy 50 120−130
+140%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 139 300−310
+116%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 91 220−230
+142%
Valorant 160 350−400
+119%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 118 290−300
+146%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 87 210−220
+141%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 240−250 550−600
+128%
Grand Theft Auto V 72 170−180
+136%
Metro Exodus 51 120−130
+135%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 400−450
+129%
Valorant 277 650−700
+135%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 81 200−210
+147%
Cyberpunk 2077 36 85−90
+136%
Far Cry 5 93 230−240
+147%
Forza Horizon 4 103 250−260
+143%
Hogwarts Legacy 38 90−95
+137%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65 150−160
+138%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 77 190−200
+147%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 25 60−65
+140%
Grand Theft Auto V 72 170−180
+136%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24 50−55
+127%
Metro Exodus 31 75−80
+142%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 48 110−120
+129%
Valorant 231 550−600
+138%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 54 130−140
+141%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40 95−100
+144%
Cyberpunk 2077 15 35−40
+133%
Dota 2 100 240−250
+140%
Far Cry 5 47 110−120
+134%
Forza Horizon 4 70 170−180
+143%
Hogwarts Legacy 21 50−55
+138%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 59 140−150
+137%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 39 95−100
+144%

This is how RX 5700 and RTX 5090 D V2 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5090 D V2 is 146% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5090 D V2 is 146% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 5090 D V2 is 133% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 33.85 84.06
Recency 7 July 2019 15 August 2025
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 575 Watt

RX 5700 has 69% lower power consumption.

RTX 5090 D V2, on the other hand, has a 148% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 29% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 5700 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 2437 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 79 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 5700 or GeForce RTX 5090 D V2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.