Radeon RX 6800S vs RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary with Radeon RX 6800S, including specs and performance data.

RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary
2019, $449
8 GB GDDR6, 225 Watt
39.57
+6.2%

5700 XT 50th Anniversary outperforms 6800S by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking127145
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation30.37no data
Power efficiency13.7029.03
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameNavi 10Navi 23
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date7 July 2019 (7 years ago)4 January 2022 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$449 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25602048
Core clock speed1680 MHz1800 MHz
Boost clock speed1980 MHz2100 MHz
Number of transistors10,300 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate316.8268.8
Floating-point processing power10.14 TFLOPS8.602 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs160128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32
L0 Cacheno data512 KB
L1 Cacheno data512 KB
L2 Cache4 MB2 MB
L3 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary 39.57
+6.2%
RX 6800S 37.27

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary 16553
+6.2%
Samples: 238
RX 6800S 15593
Samples: 230

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD120−130
+3.4%
116
1440p75−80
+0%
75
4K40−45
+0%
40

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.74no data
1440p5.99no data
4K11.23no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 110−120 110−120
Counter-Strike 2 200−210 200−210
Cyberpunk 2077 141 141

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 110−120 110−120
Battlefield 5 130−140 130−140
Counter-Strike 2 200−210 200−210
Cyberpunk 2077 111 111
Far Cry 5 120 120
Fortnite 160−170 160−170
Forza Horizon 4 140−150 140−150
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160 150−160
Valorant 220−230 220−230

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 110−120 110−120
Battlefield 5 130−140 130−140
Counter-Strike 2 200−210 200−210
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 270−280
Cyberpunk 2077 82 82
Dota 2 128 128
Far Cry 5 112 112
Far Cry 6 107 107
Fortnite 160−170 160−170
Forza Horizon 4 140−150 140−150
Grand Theft Auto V 125 125
Metro Exodus 90−95 90−95
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160 150−160
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 164 164
Valorant 220−230 220−230

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140 130−140
Cyberpunk 2077 74 74
Dota 2 107 107
Far Cry 5 104 104
Forza Horizon 4 140−150 140−150
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160 150−160
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 92 92
Valorant 214 214

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 160−170 160−170

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 95−100 95−100
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 260−270 260−270
Far Cry 6 72 72
Grand Theft Auto V 66 66
Metro Exodus 55−60 55−60
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 260−270 260−270

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 95−100 95−100
Cyberpunk 2077 39 39
Far Cry 5 90−95 90−95
Forza Horizon 4 100−110 100−110
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75 70−75

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 100−105 100−105

4K
High

Atomic Heart 30−33 30−33
Counter-Strike 2 40−45 40−45
Far Cry 6 30−33 30−33
Grand Theft Auto V 80−85 80−85
Metro Exodus 30−35 30−35
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65 60−65
Valorant 230−240 230−240

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 60−65 60−65
Counter-Strike 2 40−45 40−45
Cyberpunk 2077 16 16
Dota 2 100−110 100−110
Far Cry 5 50−55 50−55
Forza Horizon 4 70−75 70−75
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55 50−55

4K
Epic

Fortnite 45−50 45−50

This is how RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary and RX 6800S compete in popular games:

  • RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary is 3% faster in 1080p
  • A tie in 1440p
  • A tie in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 39.57 37.27
Recency 7 July 2019 4 January 2022
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 100 Watt

RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary has a 6% higher aggregate performance score.

RX 6800S, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 56% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary and Radeon RX 6800S.

Be aware that Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary is a desktop graphics card while Radeon RX 6800S is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 8318 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 187 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6800S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary or Radeon RX 6800S, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.