Tesla PG500-216 vs Radeon RX 560X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking546not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.04no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Volta (2017−2020)
GPU code namePolaris 21GV100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date11 April 2018 (8 years ago)26 November 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10245120
Core clock speed1175 MHz1260 MHz
Boost clock speed1275 MHz1380 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million21,100 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate81.60441.6
Floating-point processing power2.611 TFLOPS14.13 TFLOPS
ROPs16128
TMUs64320
Tensor Coresno data640
L1 Cache256 KB10 MB
L2 Cache1024 KB6 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Length170 mmno data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount4 GB32 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1106 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/s1,133 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA-7.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 April 2018 26 November 2019
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 250 Watt

RX 560X has 233% lower power consumption.

Tesla PG500-216, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 17% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 560X and Tesla PG500-216. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 560X is a desktop graphics card while Tesla PG500-216 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 497 votes

Rate Radeon RX 560X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 3 votes

Rate Tesla PG500-216 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 560X or Tesla PG500-216, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.