Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics vs Radeon RX 5600 XT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking199not rated
Place by popularity73not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation36.42no data
Power efficiency16.60no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Gen. 5 Arrandale (2010)
GPU code nameNavi 10GMA HD
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date21 January 2020 (6 years ago)10 January 2010 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$279 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores230412
Core clock speed1130 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed1560 MHzno data
Number of transistors10,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate224.6no data
Floating-point processing power7.188 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs144no data
L2 Cache3 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount6 GBno data
Memory bus width192 Bitno data
Memory clock speed14000 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortno data
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)10
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX 5600 XT 86004
+28809%
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics 298

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 January 2020 10 January 2010
Chip lithography 7 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 35 Watt

RX 5600 XT has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 84% more advanced lithography process.

Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics, on the other hand, has 77% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 5600 XT and Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 5600 XT is a desktop graphics card while Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 3573 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 146 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 5600 XT or Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.