Arc A370M vs Radeon RX 560

Place in the ranking	550	459
Place by popularity	100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	1.48	no data
Power efficiency	9.16	27.23
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	Xe-HPG (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Polaris 21	DG2-128
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	18 April 2017 (9 years ago)	30 March 2022 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$99	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	1024
Core clock speed	1175 MHz	1550 MHz
Boost clock speed	1275 MHz	2050 MHz
Number of transistors	3,000 million	7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	35 Watt
Texture fill rate	81.60	131.2
Floating-point processing power	2.611 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	16	32
TMUs	64	64
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	8
L1 Cache	256 KB	1.5 MB
L2 Cache	1024 KB	4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	170 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	112.0 GB/s	112.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-
Resizable BAR	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	Portable Device Dependent
HDMI	+	-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.4

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 560 8.82

Arc A370M 12.23
+38.7%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 560 3688
Samples: 5345

Arc A370M 5115
+38.7%

Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	35	39 +11.4%
1440p	14−16	20 +42.9%
4K	24−27	34 +41.7%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	2.83	no data
1440p	7.07	no data
4K	4.13	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart	56	56
Counter-Strike 2	65−70	65−70
Cyberpunk 2077	46	46

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart	42	42
Battlefield 5	50−55	50−55
Counter-Strike 2	65−70	65−70
Cyberpunk 2077	37	37
Far Cry 5	49	49
Fortnite	70−75	70−75
Forza Horizon 4	50−55	50−55
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	45−50	45−50
Valorant	100−110	100−110

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart	24	24
Battlefield 5	50−55	50−55
Counter-Strike 2	65−70	65−70
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	170−180	170−180
Cyberpunk 2077	25	25
Dota 2	68	68
Far Cry 5	46	46
Far Cry 6	35	35
Fortnite	70−75	70−75
Forza Horizon 4	50−55	50−55
Grand Theft Auto V	28	28
Metro Exodus	34	34
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	45−50	45−50
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	53	53
Valorant	100−110	100−110

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5	50−55	50−55
Cyberpunk 2077	21	21
Dota 2	66	66
Far Cry 5	43	43
Forza Horizon 4	50−55	50−55
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	45−50	45−50
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	26	26
Valorant	100−110	100−110

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite

70−75

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2	24−27	24−27
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	90−95	90−95
Far Cry 6	18−20	18−20
Grand Theft Auto V	11	11
Metro Exodus	20	20
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	95−100	95−100
Valorant	110−120	110−120

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5	30−35	30−35
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12	10−12
Far Cry 5	29	29
Forza Horizon 4	30−33	30−33
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18	16−18

1440p
Epic

Fortnite

27−30

4K
High

Atomic Heart	10−11	10−11
Counter-Strike 2	8−9	8−9
Far Cry 6	6−7	6−7
Grand Theft Auto V	21−24	21−24
Metro Exodus	8−9	8−9
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18	16−18
Valorant	55−60	55−60

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5	16−18	16−18
Counter-Strike 2	8−9	8−9
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5	4−5
Dota 2	40	40
Far Cry 5	12−14	12−14
Forza Horizon 4	21−24	21−24
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	12−14	12−14

4K
Epic

Fortnite

12−14

This is how RX 560 and Arc A370M compete in popular games:

Arc A370M is 11% faster in 1080p
Arc A370M is 43% faster in 1440p
Arc A370M is 42% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	8.82	12.23
Recency	18 April 2017	30 March 2022
Chip lithography	14 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	35 Watt

Arc A370M has a 39% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 57% more advanced lithography process, and 53% lower power consumption.

The Arc A370M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 560 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 560 is a desktop graphics card while Arc A370M is a notebook one.