Xclipse 960 GPU vs Radeon RX 550X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking670not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.64no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)MGFX4 (2026)
GPU code nameLexaJuno
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date16 December 2018 (7 years ago)11 March 2026 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5121024
Core clock speed1100 MHz985 MHz
Boost clock speed1183 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm2 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate37.8663.04
Floating-point processing power1.211 TFLOPSno data
ROPs1664
TMUs3264
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L0 Cacheno data256 KB
L1 Cache128 KB512 KB
L2 Cache512 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8IGP
Length145 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1500 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth96 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)N/A
Shader Model6.4N/A
OpenGL4.6ES 3.2
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 December 2018 11 March 2026
Chip lithography 14 nm 2 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 15 Watt

Xclipse 960 GPU has an age advantage of 7 years, a 86% more advanced lithography process, and 70% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 550X and Xclipse 960 GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 550X is a desktop graphics card while Xclipse 960 GPU is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 132 votes

Rate Radeon RX 550X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xclipse 960 GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 550X or Xclipse 960 GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.