GeForce RTX 4090 vs Radeon RX 5500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 5500 and GeForce RTX 4090, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 5500
2019
4 GB GDDR6, 110 Watt
21.12
RTX 4090
2022, $1,599
24 GB GDDR6X, 450 Watt
90.90
+330%

RTX 4090 outperforms RX 5500 by a whopping 330% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking3093
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data30.83
Power efficiency14.9615.74
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 14AD102
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date7 October 2019 (7 years ago)20 September 2022 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores140816384
Core clock speedno data2235 MHz
Boost clock speed1845 MHz2520 MHz
Number of transistors6,400 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt450 Watt
Texture fill rate162.41,290.2
Floating-point processing power5.196 TFLOPS82.58 TFLOPS
ROPs32176
TMUs88512
Tensor Coresno data512
Ray Tracing Coresno data128
L1 Cacheno data16 MB
L2 Cacheno data72 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length180 mm304 mm
Width2-slot3-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount4 GB24 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s1.01 TB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI++

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.4
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 5500 21.12
RTX 4090 90.90
+330%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 5500 8835
Samples: 430
RTX 4090 38031
+330%
Samples: 22698

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD55−60
−77.6%
246
1440p40−45
−78.3%
184
4K30−35
−77.6%
134

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data6.50
1440pno data8.69
4Kno data11.93

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 324 324
Counter-Strike 2 351 351
Cyberpunk 2077 227 227

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 265 265
Battlefield 5 190−200 190−200
Counter-Strike 2 340 340
Cyberpunk 2077 224 224
Far Cry 5 209 209
Fortnite 300−350 300−350
Forza Horizon 4 300−350 300−350
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 650−700 650−700

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 234 234
Battlefield 5 190−200 190−200
Counter-Strike 2 340 340
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 270−280
Cyberpunk 2077 215 215
Dota 2 253 253
Far Cry 5 201 201
Far Cry 6 176 176
Fortnite 300−350 300−350
Forza Horizon 4 300−350 300−350
Grand Theft Auto V 174 174
Metro Exodus 230 230
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 578 578
Valorant 650−700 650−700

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 190−200 190−200
Cyberpunk 2077 211 211
Dota 2 224 224
Far Cry 5 187 187
Forza Horizon 4 300−350 300−350
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 305 305
Valorant 680 680

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 300−350 300−350

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 312 312
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 500−550 500−550
Far Cry 6 164 164
Grand Theft Auto V 162 162
Metro Exodus 180 180
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 450−500 450−500

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 190−200 190−200
Cyberpunk 2077 159 159
Far Cry 5 187 187
Forza Horizon 4 300−350 300−350
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 262 262

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160 150−160

4K
High

Atomic Heart 102 102
Counter-Strike 2 166 166
Far Cry 6 134 134
Grand Theft Auto V 187 187
Metro Exodus 137 137
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 281 281
Valorant 300−350 300−350

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140 130−140
Counter-Strike 2 140−150 140−150
Cyberpunk 2077 81 81
Dota 2 227 227
Far Cry 5 170 170
Forza Horizon 4 300−350 300−350
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100 95−100

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80 75−80

This is how RX 5500 and RTX 4090 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4090 is 347% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4090 is 360% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4090 is 347% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.12 90.90
Recency 7 October 2019 20 September 2022
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 450 Watt

RX 5500 has 76% lower power consumption.

RTX 4090, on the other hand, has a 330% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 29% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4090 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 5500 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 286 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 18242 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 5500 or GeForce RTX 4090, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.