GMA 3150 vs Radeon RX 5500 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking3001612
Place by popularity72not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation30.73no data
Power efficiency12.94no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Generation 4.0 (2006−2007)
GPU code nameNavi 14Pineview
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date12 December 2019 (6 years ago)9 May 2007 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$169 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores140816
Core clock speed1607 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1845 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,400 million123 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate162.40.8
Floating-point processing power5.196 TFLOPS0.0128 TFLOPS
ROPs321
TMUs882
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCI
Length180 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed14000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0c
Shader Model6.53.0
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 5500 XT 9051
+452450%
Samples: 4102
GMA 3150 2
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD76no data
1440p42no data
4K24no data

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.22no data
1440p4.02no data
4K7.04no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 98 no data
Counter-Strike 2 254 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 78 no data

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 75 no data
Battlefield 5 74 no data
Counter-Strike 2 196 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 61 no data
Far Cry 5 105 no data
Fortnite 110−120 no data
Forza Horizon 4 78 no data
Forza Horizon 5 109 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90 no data
Valorant 150−160 no data

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 43 no data
Battlefield 5 71 no data
Counter-Strike 2 98 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 240−250 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 45 no data
Dota 2 149 no data
Far Cry 5 96 no data
Fortnite 110−120 no data
Forza Horizon 4 66 no data
Forza Horizon 5 94 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 94 no data
Metro Exodus 52 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95 no data
Valorant 150−160 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 68 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 40 no data
Dota 2 143 no data
Far Cry 5 89 no data
Forza Horizon 4 56 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 58 no data
Valorant 114 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 110−120 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 55 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 150−160 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 44 no data
Metro Exodus 31 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 no data
Valorant 180−190 no data

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 20 no data
Far Cry 5 60 no data
Forza Horizon 4 41 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 50−55 no data

4K
High

Atomic Heart 18−20 no data
Counter-Strike 2 13 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 42 no data
Metro Exodus 19 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 31 no data
Valorant 120−130 no data

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35 no data
Counter-Strike 2 21−24 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 8 no data
Dota 2 78 no data
Far Cry 5 30 no data
Forza Horizon 4 21 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 24−27 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 December 2019 9 May 2007
Chip lithography 7 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 13 Watt

RX 5500 XT has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 543% more advanced lithography process.

GMA 3150, on the other hand, has 900% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 5500 XT and GMA 3150. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 5500 XT is a desktop graphics card while GMA 3150 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 3538 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5500 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 181 votes

Rate GMA 3150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 5500 XT or GMA 3150, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.