GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile vs Radeon RX 550

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 550 with GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RX 550
2017, $79
4 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
6.46

RTX 4090 Mobile outperforms RX 550 by a whopping 900% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking63331
Place by popularity44not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.92no data
Power efficiency10.0641.93
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameLexaAD103
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date20 April 2017 (9 years ago)3 January 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$79 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5129728
Core clock speed1100 MHz1335 MHz
Boost clock speed1183 MHz1695 MHz
Number of transistors2,200 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate37.86515.3
Floating-point processing power1.211 TFLOPS32.98 TFLOPS
ROPs16112
TMUs32304
Tensor Coresno data304
Ray Tracing Coresno data76
L1 Cache128 KB9.5 MB
L2 Cache512 KB64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Length145 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 550 6.46
RTX 4090 Mobile 64.61
+900%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 550 2702
Samples: 1458
RTX 4090 Mobile 27029
+900%
Samples: 3331

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD16−18167
+944%
1440p12−14126
+950%
4K7−877
+1000%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.94no data
1440p6.58no data
4K11.29no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 300−350 300−350
Cyberpunk 2077 147 147
Resident Evil 4 Remake 218 218

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 170−180 170−180
Counter-Strike 2 240 240
Cyberpunk 2077 142 142
Far Cry 5 173 173
Fortnite 300−350 300−350
Forza Horizon 4 250−260 250−260
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 350−400 350−400

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 170−180 170−180
Counter-Strike 2 214 214
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 270−280
Cyberpunk 2077 133 133
Dota 2 199 199
Far Cry 5 167 167
Far Cry 6 140 140
Fortnite 300−350 300−350
Forza Horizon 4 250−260 250−260
Grand Theft Auto V 162 162
Metro Exodus 156 156
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 394 394
Valorant 350−400 350−400

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 170−180 170−180
Cyberpunk 2077 128 128
Dota 2 187 187
Far Cry 5 158 158
Forza Horizon 4 250−260 250−260
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 204 204
Valorant 350−400 350−400

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 300−350 300−350

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 173 173
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 516 516
Far Cry 6 113 113
Grand Theft Auto V 138 138
Metro Exodus 117 117
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 485 485

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 160−170 160−170
Cyberpunk 2077 95 95
Far Cry 5 151 151
Forza Horizon 4 220−230 220−230
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 164 164

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160 150−160

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 88 88
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 314 314
Far Cry 6 80 80
Grand Theft Auto V 172 172
Metro Exodus 82 82
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 150 150
Valorant 300−350 300−350

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 120−130 120−130
Counter-Strike 2 90−95 90−95
Cyberpunk 2077 48 48
Dota 2 179 179
Far Cry 5 107 107
Forza Horizon 4 170−180 170−180
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100 95−100

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80 75−80

This is how RX 550 and RTX 4090 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4090 Mobile is 944% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4090 Mobile is 950% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4090 Mobile is 1000% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 62 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.46 64.61
Recency 20 April 2017 3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 120 Watt

RX 550 has 58% lower power consumption.

RTX 4090 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 900% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 71% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 550 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 550 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 8390 votes

Rate Radeon RX 550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 919 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 550 or GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.