GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs Radeon RX 550

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 550 and GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 550
2017, $79
4 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
6.45
RTX 4070 SUPER
2024, $599
12 GB GDDR6X, 220 Watt
71.56
+1009%

RTX 4070 SUPER outperforms RX 550 by a whopping 1009% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking63518
Place by popularity44not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.9271.04
Power efficiency10.0425.31
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameLexaAD104
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date20 April 2017 (9 years ago)8 January 2024 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$79 $599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

RTX 4070 SUPER has 2333% better value for money than RX 550.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5127168
Core clock speed1100 MHz1980 MHz
Boost clock speed1183 MHz2475 MHz
Number of transistors2,200 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt220 Watt
Texture fill rate37.86554.4
Floating-point processing power1.211 TFLOPS35.48 TFLOPS
ROPs1680
TMUs32224
Tensor Coresno data224
Ray Tracing Coresno data56
L1 Cache128 KB7 MB
L2 Cache512 KB48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Length145 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount4 GB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/s504.2 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI++

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 550 6.45
RTX 4070 SUPER 71.56
+1009%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 550 2698
Samples: 1463
RTX 4070 SUPER 29937
+1010%
Samples: 16178

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18−20214
+1089%
1440p10−12133
+1230%
4K7−881
+1057%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.392.80
+36.2%
1440p7.904.50
+43%
4K11.297.40
+34.5%
  • RTX 4070 SUPER has 36% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RTX 4070 SUPER has 43% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RTX 4070 SUPER has 34% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 300−350 300−350
Cyberpunk 2077 196 196
Hogwarts Legacy 160−170 160−170
Resident Evil 4 Remake 220−230 220−230

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 180−190 180−190
Counter-Strike 2 300−350 300−350
Cyberpunk 2077 184 184
Far Cry 5 203 203
Fortnite 300−350 300−350
Forza Horizon 4 290−300 290−300
Hogwarts Legacy 160−170 160−170
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 400−450 400−450

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 180−190 180−190
Counter-Strike 2 300−350 300−350
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 270−280
Cyberpunk 2077 159 159
Far Cry 5 200 200
Fortnite 300−350 300−350
Forza Horizon 4 290−300 290−300
Grand Theft Auto V 173 173
Hogwarts Legacy 160−170 160−170
Metro Exodus 185 185
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 412 412
Valorant 400−450 400−450

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 180−190 180−190
Cyberpunk 2077 144 144
Far Cry 5 190 190
Forza Horizon 4 290−300 290−300
Hogwarts Legacy 160−170 160−170
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 201 201
Valorant 400−450 400−450

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 300−350 300−350

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 230−240 230−240
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 500−550 500−550
Grand Theft Auto V 148 148
Metro Exodus 118 118
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 450−500 450−500

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 190−200 190−200
Cyberpunk 2077 92 92
Far Cry 5 183 183
Forza Horizon 4 250−260 250−260
Hogwarts Legacy 100−110 100−110
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 154 154

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160 150−160

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 100−110 100−110
Grand Theft Auto V 166 166
Hogwarts Legacy 55−60 55−60
Metro Exodus 74 74
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 133 133
Valorant 300−350 300−350

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140 130−140
Counter-Strike 2 100−110 100−110
Cyberpunk 2077 44 44
Far Cry 5 103 103
Forza Horizon 4 210−220 210−220
Hogwarts Legacy 55−60 55−60
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100 95−100

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80 75−80

This is how RX 550 and RTX 4070 SUPER compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4070 SUPER is 1089% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4070 SUPER is 1230% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4070 SUPER is 1057% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 62 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.45 71.56
Recency 20 April 2017 8 January 2024
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 220 Watt

RX 550 has 77% lower power consumption.

RTX 4070 SUPER, on the other hand, has a 1009% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 64% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 550 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 8390 votes

Rate Radeon RX 550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 7903 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 550 or GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.