Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs Radeon RX 470 Mobile
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 366 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 3.78 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 15.13 | no data |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) | Turing (2018−2022) |
| GPU code name | Ellesmere | TU102 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 4 August 2016 (10 years ago) | 13 August 2018 (7 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $549.99 | $9,999 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2048 | 4608 |
| Core clock speed | 926 MHz | 1230 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1074 MHz | 1620 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 5,700 million | 18,600 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | 260 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 137.5 | 466.6 |
| Floating-point processing power | 4.399 TFLOPS | 14.93 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 96 |
| TMUs | 128 | 288 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 576 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 72 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 4.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 267 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 48 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz | 1750 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | 672.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| FreeSync | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | - | 7.5 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 4 August 2016 | 13 August 2018 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 48 GB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | 260 Watt |
RX 470 Mobile has 206% lower power consumption.
RTX 8000 Passive, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 17% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 470 Mobile and Quadro RTX 8000 Passive. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon RX 470 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Quadro RTX 8000 Passive is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
